Re: [IAC#RG] Priority to New Topics

Inordinate delay, in terms of days, in clearing the newly posted
messages, by Moderators, is highly regretted.

On 2/14/13, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Dr Ratnesh
>
> Since it seems your views communicated to me are also shared by a few of
> the former so-called city coordinators of previous IAC, I am addressing
> these directly and very bluntly.
>
> 1) Anna Hazare is a corrupt fellow. Arvind Kejriwal is a corrupt fellow.
> If you feel that you can cooperate with them to fight corruption, then for
> me every system and principle of logic equates that you are a corrupt
> person also. It was a precondition for my assuming mantle over IAC that
> these corrupt people should be made to leave the movement. Accordingly,
> Arvind has floated AAP, and Anna BVJA, JA or whatever.
>
> 2) IAC, under me, is an open and transparent REVOLUTIONARY REFORM MOVEMENT
> . Unlike Arvind's IAC where he wouldn't even dare to publish a common code
> of conduct for adherents, within 1 month of my assuming (honorary) office I
> ensured that IAC had a basic Charter document in place stating our
> movement's aims, principles, methods and priorities. I hope you have read
> it carefully and understood it. It seems that this document will have to be
> explained in detail to the movement and also updated if necessary.
> Absorbing this document is a precondition to further initiation / progress
> in the movement.
>
> 3) IAC now does not have to wait for basic decisions to be taken while
> Arvind returns from Vipassana (to cure his alcoholism ???) so that he could
> fast on Gandhi's birthday (Oct 2). You are privy to all this and the docs
> are in the public domain.
>
> 4) You know as well as I do that the crowds which used to gather at IAC
> meetings are ephemeral (ie. brief and fleeting) and "rented" / "on loan".
> For my IAC, people, crowds etc are a NUISANCE and LIABILITY. The former IAC
> people who are drifting in the wind are the biggest liability we have
> because we don't know them or what they stand for or how/why they were
> inducted in the movement in the first place. All we know is that Anna and
> Arvind between them inducted some very corrupt people into the movement
> many of whom are unwilling / unable to leave. IAC is apolitical now and
> condemns not only political parties but also political process. So why/what
> the fuck (Wtf) do we need crowds for ? I openly told my seniors in the
> movement that I have no need for those left over "I am Anna" topis and
> T-shirts and other "branded" merchandise which they were trying to offload
> on me. I bluntly told them Anna is no longer needed by IAC and he can find
> new sponsors. Last I heard "Team Anna" were desperately selling it at Rs. 5
> each in Patna
>
> 5) Another thing, IAC has no need for gimmicks, like Gandhiji's footprints
> or ashes or mortal soil or flag waving etc. IAC is only one of the faces of
> HRA. HRA was, and is still, completely opposed to traitors like Gandhi and
> his bastard "children", who have brought this country to where it is - On
> its knees !! HRA has always stood for secularism, strength and
> non-appeasement. Its members must be morally pure, selfless and dedicated.
> That is all we ask.
>
> Before concluding, ask yourself what is common between
> A) Sachindranath Sanyal
> B) Rajendra Lahiri
> C) Pandit Bismil
> D) Ashfaqullah Khan
> E) Jadugopal Mukherjee etc.
> that made them separate from the Indian freedom movement in 1922 at Gaya in
> Bihar.
>
> Today we have a new freedom struggle against imperialism going on and
> nothing has changed in 90 years and HRA (and therefore IAC) is still going
> strong in its traditional areas.
>
> All those people who are masquerading as IAC are being watched and will be
> made examples of at the right time.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:21 PM, <drrkcy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear All
>>
>> Jai Hind
>>
>> Everybody will b agree that v all want a corruption free India.So all
>> like
>> minded people shd work together or at least help.But following questions
>> arises:
>> 1.What is th action plan 2 fight against corruption & loot ?
>> 2.How many vol
>> r associated in this IAC ?who r they?In how many districts of this
>> country? Or abroad?
>> 3.If they r in Bihar,pl let me know,v will contact them.
>> If v r really serious 2 fight against corrupt'n,v must come forward in
>> each & every corner of th country.
>> IAC doesn't hv penetration in villages & even in many districts
>> now.Arvind
>> & others hv made AAP.Now Anna has made Jantantra morcha.SO where is
>> IAC,at
>> least in Bihar?
>> Dear all, people want remedies & solutions,not words.Not new
>> organisations etc.But here v r seeing many organisations mushrooming here
>> &
>> there 2 confuse th masses on th name of anti-corruption movement,even the
>> most corruopt r running anti-corruption movement !.Let's take few
>> examples:
>> a)In patna,one of th most corroupt school mafia has started a party on th
>> name of honesty.Recently he organised prog. For Gen Vks.
>> b)Many fraud people shared dais with Anna on 30th Jan prog.Now they r
>> using video/photos with Anna 2 show that they r clean.(Even Gen vks read
>> 26 point prog. Like th manifesto of a political party)So this trend must
>> stop.
>>
>> I am with all who r in anti-corruption movement seriously,b it Anna or
>> Arvind or anybody else.
>>
>> Regards
>> Dr Ratnesh chaudhary
>> ----------
>> Sent from my Nokia
>>
>


--
(Babubhai Vaghela)
C 202, Shrinandnagar V, Makarba Road Vejalpur, Ahmedabad - 380051
M - 94276 08632
http://twitter.com/BabubhaiVaghela
About me at - http://bit.ly/9xsHFj
http://www.youtube.com/user/vaghelabd
(Administrator - Google Group - Right to Information Act 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/Right-to-Information-Act-2005/about?hl=en