Re: [HumJanenge] Re: A small clarification

Hon'ble Central Information Commission, New Delhi have decided similar
issue/cases in Mr Ajit Kumar Vs Llit Kala Akademi (CIC/AD/C/09/00429
dated 08.06.2009) and Sh K. Balakrishnan Pillai Banglore Vs National
Human Rights Commission (CIC/OK/C/2008/0016 dated 26.08.08) wherein
the Public Authority were warned for exercising dilatory tactics and
harassing the information seeker by asking him to prove his
citizenship.

On 11/7/11, Sankar Pani <sankarprasadpani@gmail.com> wrote:
> Many Many thanks Sarabjit Ji for enlighting us. i want a help on a
> recent RTI Application disposed by Orissa Info Comission.The facts of
> the matter is as bellow
>
> i had made an RTI application to wildlife dept and in this
> application attcged copy of my Driving licence where photo was not
> prominent. Orissa RTI rule demand for the Identity proof along with
> the application. My application to the dept is not the maiden one
> rather it was the fifth application and in previous application the
> PIO have already provided the info( the identity proof submitted was
> not the driving license).
>
> When i have made severall application prior to the present one, where
> lies the question of "identity not satisfactory".
>
> Can any one guide me what best plea i can take to get the order in my
> favour.
>
> Regards
>
> On 11/6/11, Devasahayam MG <mgd@airtelmail.in> wrote:
>> Got it. Thanks
>>
>> MGD
>> ________________________________________
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 4:44 PM, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/AT-13032009-07.pdf
>>>
>>> Sarbajit
>>>
>>> On Nov 6, 3:51 pm, Devasahayam MG <m...@airtelmail.in> wrote:
>>> > There are two views. Can I have any Rule or ruling?
>>> >
>>> > M.G.Devasahayam
>>> >
>>> ______________________________________________________________________________________________
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > All HC 2nd appeals are being heard in Central Information Commission
>>> since
>>> > > they are Constitutional empowered bodies.
>>> >
>>> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Sankar Pani <
>>> sankarprasadp...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >> it should be state info comission
>>> >
>>> > >> On 11/5/11, Devasahayam MG <m...@airtelmail.in> wrote:
>>> > >> > In an RTI application for info on the assets of High Court judges
>>> which
>>> > >> is
>>> > >> > the second appellate authority - State Information Commission or
>>> Central
>>> > >> > Information Commission?
>>> >
>>> > >> > M.G.Devasaayam
>>> >
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Sankar Prasad Pani
>>> > >> A-70, Sahidnagar, Bhubaneswar, Orissa
>>> > >> India
>>> > >> PIN-751007
>>> > >> Cell- 9437279278
>>> > >>http://environmentalrights-sankar.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sankar Prasad Pani
> A-70, Sahidnagar, Bhubaneswar, Orissa
> India
> PIN-751007
> Cell- 9437279278
> http://environmentalrights-sankar.blogspot.com/
>

--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181