Re: [HumJanenge] Re: RTI First Appeal u/s 19 of RTI Act

sir,
as i understand, the action of CPIO is wrong but he cannot penalize or
take action against information seeker (may be information seeker is
misusing the RTI act) for publishing the information.

On 11/10/11, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please reread para 25 carefully. The statement is qualified and the
> judgment is the opposite of what you assume it to be.
>
> The Court is actually cautioning the PIO not to disclose information
> relating to 3rd party without considering all the privacy related
> aspects, as the information would THEN be in the public domain.to an
> information seeker who can publish it to the world.
>
> Para 25 does not hold that information given in RTI can be disclosed
> to the world.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Nov 10, 9:06 am, sandeep kumar <drsandgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Once the information is provided, the applicant is within rights to
>> publish it.
>> the high court order is attached. please to to para 25.
>>
>> On 11/10/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > To:
>> > The Appellate Authority, PMO
>>
>> > Date: 09.Nov.2011
>>
>> > Sir:
>>
>> > Sub: First Appeal against RTI reply no. RTI/3832/2011-PMR dated
>> > 19.Oct.2011.
>>
>> > Kindly decide my appeal  against the above mentioned RTI reply issued by
>> > Sanjukta Ray made on the following distinct grounds set out below
>> > without
>> > prejudice to each other.
>>
>> > 1) FOR the Ld. CPIO has failed to issue me a "third party" notice u/s 11
>> > of
>> > RTI Act, for which he/she deserves to be penalised for providing the
>> > information to the aplicant without due notice to me.
>>
>> > 2) FOR the Ld. CPIO has corruptly provided 1 page of information free of
>> > charge to the applicant (a habitual RTI misuser) and thereby deprived
>> > the
>> > State of prescribed revenue and for which the CPIO deserves to
>> > penalised.
>>
>> > 3) FOR the Ld. CPIO has failed to initate prosecution under the Official
>> > Secrets Act against the applicant for publishing information obtained
>> > under
>> > RTI process over the media and internet and thereby disclosing state
>> > secrets to foreigners and other persons inimincal to the Indian State,
>> > and
>> > for which the CPIO deserves to be prosecuted.
>>
>> > Prayer:
>>
>> > A) That suitable directions be issued on my Appeal after hearing me in
>> > person on adeqaute notice to attend.
>>
>> > And for which kindness the appellant shall be ever grateful as duty
>> > bound.
>>
>> > Er. Sarbajit Roy
>> > (Appellant)
>>
>> > Address: B-59 Defence Colony, New Delhi 110024.
>> > Tel: 011-24334262
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
>> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
>> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>>
>>  publishing_of_third_party_information.pdf
>> 132KViewDownload

--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181