Re: Re: [HumJanenge] Bikaner district collector set new trend by penalising defaulting PIOs by 1000/- each

Dear Bhaskar

You have clearly regressed in RTI since I went away.
If you had examined closely like I taught you would
have remembered basic principles of estoppel and "double
jeopardy".

By imposing penalty of Rs.1,000 a corrupt IAS babu has
allowed PIO to escape penalty of Rs 25,000.

PMK

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Bhaskar Prabhu
<mahitiadhikarmanch@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is totally illegal and just praising for illegal action is uncalled
> for, there is no provision in RTI Act to do such voilative things showing
> himself to be a Messiah. Only he could do was to call for an internal
> departmental enquiry under service rule as RTI Act is work under service
> rule. Central govt and many state govt have taken GRs for to call for an
> departmental enquiry if the PIOs don't adder to RTI act and/or if appellate
> authority is not of that position then as appellate authority he need to
> inform the concerned higher ups to call for the departmental enquiry and
> this need to be entered service record, this can be prayed in 1st appeal
> prcess. and this will be of very much use full as substantiating matter
> for 2nd appeal with IC. 1st appellate authority can recommend to IC for
> penalising the PIO. Even if the information is ordered to be given by Ist
> appellate authority, penalty part can be appealed with IC as delay matter
> remains pending. I feel PIO should go IC by appeal and ist appalate
> authority should be educated on this matter.
>
> PIO need not go to court but need to be complain to IC and leave the matter
> to IC PIO can apeal for censoring of 1st appellate authority. In Maharstra
> in the beginning many AA were doing these wrong things but we tell in each
> of the workshop that ist appellate authority does not have any right to levy
> penalty under RTI but they can levy penalty under their provision service
> rules after calling a enquiry for wrong conduct or work deficiency.
>
>
> Inservice for RTI
> Bhaskar
> Mahiti Adhikar Manch
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, leslie almeida
> <leslie_almeida@rediffmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This order is Divali bonus must welcome, pendancy of 2nd appeal will come
>> down drastically
>>
>> Leslie Almeida
>>
>> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:54:40 +0530 wrote
>> >GREAT. SUCH JUDGMENTS WIOLL HELP RTI.
>> JOHAR
>>
>>
>> On 3 November 2010 16:31, manoj wrote:
>>
>> Diwali Greetings-2010
>>
>> First time in india, any appellate authority have penalised
>>
>> defaulting
>> PIOs.Bikaner district collector Dr.Prithvi Raj have set new trend by
>> directing defaulting PIOs to deposit 1000/- each within two weeks and
>> appear with deposit receipt in the court of first appeal hearing.
>>
>>
>>
>> Such intiative can lighten the burden of information
>> commissions.We can hope for smooth RTI compliance now.
>>
>> With best wishes
>> Manoj K.Kamra
>> Bikaner
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>