Re: [HumJanenge] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

Dear Guptaji

So many people are creating differences between communities and using RTI.

you reside in Delhi. have you heard of "eminent Delhi based RTI
activist Afroz Alam Sahil" who is now campaigning for political party
in his native place Bihar ? other award goes to another Bihar based
MUSLIM RTI network.

Read this story, the prize distribution is on 4.Dec.2010, Please go an
throw 2 chappals on my behalf.

http://twocircles.net/2010nov03/tcn_annual_awards_2010_winners_announced.html

S D Sharma

On 11/6/10, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> No body should try to create difference between the followers of two
> religions
> for the sake of peace and development. I doubt the credentials of Mr. S D
> Sharma. His id runs anonsharma. Whether this anon stand for anonymous and
> in
> the past, no mail by him has ever been posted. I fully sympathise with
> Kashmiri
> Pandits and others but for it is wrong to blame all for this. There are
> good
> and bad persons in every society, caste and religion.
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com>
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Sat, 6 November, 2010 6:31:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in
> today's Pioneer
>
>
> Dear Irfanji,
> I have read this person Sharma's comments which are rude and highly
> provocative.
> I am shocked. Muslims do not have 4 wives.You should not bother to react.
> Regards
> Urvi
>
>
> From: irfan khan
> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 3:58 PM
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in
> today's Pioneer
>
>
> Urvashi ji .
> supreme court is justifying live-in-relationships ( women living with men
> without marriage )and supreme court is justifying same sex marriage .
>
> if supreme court is justifying such illegal and criminal relationships then
> why
> supreme courts cant justify a duely married women as WIFE . ( Hema's case )
>
> urvashiji
>
> basically i was replying to Mr sharma who said raping kashmiri girls is
> justified. He went on to say muslims cant satisfy 4 wives so it is justified
> that army MUST rape kashmiri women .
>
> we all must condem sharma for his uncivilised comments on kashmiri girls.
>
> urvashi do u condem?????
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I agree with Khemani sahab.In fact,my mailbox is flooded with these mails.I
> am
> on the rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com and am happy with
> that.Incidentally,Mr
> Khan,the law applicable in Dharmendra's case is the Hindu law and it is
> uneqivocal in its position.There is a Supreme Court judgement on this,as I
> understand it.
>>PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE ME FROM ALL GROUPS OTHER THAN
>>rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com I fail to understand why there s no unity
>>though.It probably requires the cause being put above individual egos.
>>Regards,
>>Urvi
>>
>>
>>From: Bimal Khemani
>>Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 12:18 PM
>>To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>>Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in
>>
>>today's Pioneer
>>
>>
>>
>>I WOULD REQUEST THE MODERATOR OF THIS GROUP TO STOP SUCH ABUSIVE ARTICLES
>> AND
>>LETTERS
>>
>>BIMAL KUMAR KHEMANI,
>>TRAP group of RTI activists
>> ALIGARH (U.P.)
>> Mob:09359724625
>>******************************************
>>Officially Certified A Grade by DoPT
>>*****************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>On 6 November 2010 12:09, irfan khan <rtirti.khan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Dear sharma .
>>>
>>>this shows how uneducated and un civilised you are .
>>>
>>>I pray to Allah that he may send indian army to your area and let the army
>>> rape
>>>your wife and daughters . I am praying this because you do not have any
>>>objection to this .
>>>
>>>
>>>as far as 4 wifes of muslims is concerned .Just read following.
>>>
>>>
>>>Hema malini is second wife of Dharmendra . If you follow Hindu marriage
>>> act Hema
>>>cannot be "Wife " since Hindu marriage act do not allow second wife .
>>>
>>>this means Hema is Rakhel" of Dharmendra and Isha Deol is his "Bastard
>>> child "
>>>
>>>However if u follow Islamic law . Hema malini is legal WIFE and Ish Deol
>>> is his
>>>legal daughter .
>>>
>>>Islam is giving status of WIFE to hema wheras Hindu law is giving her
>>> status of
>>>RAKHEL . now tell me which law is giving hema respect ?????
>>>
>>>Islam permits more than one wife to stop extra marital affairs . Extra
>>> marital
>>>affairs give status of RAKHEL to women . islam say . if you love her ,
>>> marry her
>>>and give full honour and status . Dont treat her like RAKHEL.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:12 AM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>You are talking like wazahat sahib. approach you are suggesting has not
>>> worked
>>>for over 60 yaers. India must pull out its troops to jammu, use neutron
>>> bomb and
>>>solve problem finally. Kashmiri youth are asking to be killed, why are
>>> they
>>>throwing stones and bombs. Rape is effective mean for army to control and
>>>dominate. Indian soldiers spend many months away from wive and family.
>>> since no
>>>local brothels and too many rti queries then raping local girls is best
>>> low cost
>>>solution Also it is scientific fact that 1 muslim man cannot satisfy 4
>>> wives so
>>>where is harm if Indian army helps local poplation.
>>>>
>>>>S D Sharma
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Abhimanyu <who.will.file.rti@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>The easiest way to solve kashmir problem is to WIN OVER the hearts and
>>>> minds of
>>>>the kashmiris ..
>>>>>
>>>>>this cannot be done through raping kashmiri gilrs and killing kashmiri
>>>>> youth.The
>>>>>history is evident that we failed to win kashmir through raping and
>>>>> killing .
>>>>>
>>>>>now lets try to win over kashmir through attemps made to win over hearts
>>>>> and
>>>>>minds of kashmiris.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:28 AM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Dear Mr
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You are 110% correct that there is diference of opinion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>ms Rundhati Roy is 110% correct that Kashmir is not integral part of
>>>>>> India and
>>>>>>this is historical fact. Kashmir enjoys special status under India's
>>>>>> Constition
>>>>>>under the accession of Maharaja to India. India is a federation of
>>>>>> states, each
>>>>>>state negotiates its union with India. kashmir negotiated its accession
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>India. Unilaterally the agreement cannot be changed by one side unless
>>>>>> through
>>>>>>the force of arms. If India has Imperialist ambistions then the proper
>>>>>> thing to
>>>>>>do is it use our neutron bomb and peacefully eliminate all Muslims in
>>>>>> Kashmri
>>>>>>since there are only about 4.000. pandits left in Kashmir who would
>>>>>> gladly
>>>>>>become martyrs to final solution of kashmir problem
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>S D Sharma
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Amitabh Thakur <amitabhth@yahoo.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Friends,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>My Article in today's Pioneer presenting my views on the case related
>>>>>>> with Ms
>>>>>>>Arundhati Roy, Mr Geelani etc.
>>>>>>>There would certainly be difference on opinion on this but I
>>>>>>> personally stick to
>>>>>>>the opinion presented by me here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://epaper.dailypioneer.com/THEPIONEER/PIONEER/2010/11/04/ArticleHtmls/04_11_2010_009_030.shtml?Mode=1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>As an alternative link-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://epaper.dailypioneer.com/Thepioneer/Pioneer/2010/11/04/index.shtml
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Amitabh Thakur
>>>>>>>IPS,
>>>>>>>Currently at IIM Lucknow
>>>>>>># 94155-34526
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>