I agree with you. If you desire I can request an "enforcer" from one of
the other groups to "manage" this otherwise unregulated group also.
Sarbajit
Chief Patron of the RTI Unity project.
On 12/19/10, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> We are deviating from the main issue.
>
> ________________________________
> From: raja bunch <bunch_raja@yahoo.co.in>
> To: rti4empowerment@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Sat, 18 December, 2010 8:28:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Reply: [rti4empowerment] PENDENCY AT CIC
>
>
> U R sadly mistaken,he is Prabhu man.
>
> --- On Sat, 18/12/10, DSouza Wilberious Evanglist <wilevades@yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>
>>From: DSouza Wilberious Evanglist <wilevades@yahoo.co.uk>
>>Subject: Reply: [rti4empowerment] PENDENCY AT CIC
>>To: "Bhaskar Prabhu" <mahitiadhikarmanch@gmail.com>
>>Cc: rti4empowerment@googlegroups.com
>>Date: Saturday, 18 December, 2010, 6:02 PM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Prabhu maam,
>>
>>Assuming that you are a Konkani, if not I apologise.
>>
>>Please read attachments.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>WEDS
>>
> ________________________________
> From: Bhaskar Prabhu <mahitiadhikarmanch@gmail.com>
>>To: rti4empowerment@googlegroups.com
>>Sent: Sat, 18 December, 2010 10:43:27
>>Subject: Re: [rti4empowerment] PENDENCY AT CIC
>>
>>
>>Dear All,
>>There is no necessary to increase Informatuion Ciommissioners but let them
>>increse disposals, which is possible.
>>Yours in RTI service
>>Bhaskar
>>
>>
>>On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:13 PM, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>>
>>Mr. Rakesh Gupta, RTI activist has received the following information from
>> the
>>CIC on the pendency of cases in reply to his RTI application.
>>>Figures mentioned herein speak for themselves about the dire need to
>>> increase
>>>the strength of Information Commissioners at CIC.
>>>
>>>STATUS OF PENDING CASES AT CIC
>>
>>S. No.
>>
>>
>>1 Information Commissioner
>> (Shri/Ms)
>>
>>2 6 months to one year
>>3 Over 12 months
>>
>>4 Total
>>(column 3 & 4)
>>
>>5 Up to 3 months
>>
>>
>>6 3-6 months
>>
>>
>>7 Grand Total
>>
>>
>>8
>>1. A. N. Tiwari 90 27 117 790 295 1202
>>2. Shailesh Gandhi 0 03 03 738 49 787
>>(Col6&7)
>>3. AnnapurnaDixit 02 02 04 1000 38 1040(Col.4,6,7)
>>4. Dr. M A Ansari 0 5 05 443 44 487
>>(Col. 6&7)
>>5. M L Sharma 0 6 06 1314 3134 4448
>>(col. 6&7)
>>6. Satyanand Mishra 234 07 341 536 341 1111
>>(col 3, 5&6)
>>7. Sushma Singh 23 23 46 595 84 702
>>(col (3,5&6)
>>8. Deepak Sandhu 230 09 239 1200 450 1880
>>(col.3,5&6)
>>9. Wajahat Habibullah 327 270 597 879 535 2011
>>Total pendencyi against col. 3,4,6&7)
>>10. Total 13,668
>>
>>1. Total pending cases – 13,668
>>2. Vacancies of ICs04 – One more shall occur after the
>>retirement of Shri A N Tiwari.
>>
>>3. Cases pending less than
>>3 months - 54.84%
>>6 months - 91.20%
>>3-6 months - 36.36%
>>Over 6 months- - 8.80%
>>6-12 months - 6.61% -
>> Over 12 months - 2.19%
>>
>>Notes-
>>1. Cases of Shri Wajahat Habibullah are yet to be distributed.
>>2. Cases of Dr. M A Ansari have been transferred to others ICs.
>>3. Cases of Shri A. N. Tiwari will be transferred to others after his
>>
>>retirement.
>>
>>
>>(Though utmost care has been exercised in putting the figures, the author
>> is not
>>responsible for any inadvertent mistakes and the figures supplied by the
>> CIC to
>>Mr. Rakesh Gupta shall be treated as final. Totals have been given in the
>> same
>>format as has been informed by Mr. Rakesh Gupta)
>>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.