Reply: [rti4empowerment] REQUEST TO USE RTI POWER TO INITIATE CONFISCATION OF CORRUPT POLITICIANS AGRICULTURAL LANDS UNDER KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT

Dear Dr.Sharma,

 

Despite all that, let us not be pessimistic but, optimistic. It is complicated but not an unsermountable one. If we manifest solidarity among ourselves all over India, Public servants, now only in name will; definitely be Public Servants in deed.

 

A VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR WITH RIGHT TO INFORMATION BOLSTERED

 

Regards,

WEDS

---

From: Dr. Jagnarain Sharma <dr.jagnarainsharma@gmail.com>
To: rti4empowerment@googlegroups.com
Cc: legaldocumentations@yahoo.co.in; humjanenge@googlegroups.com; rtiyashada@gmail.co; thekirti@yahoogroups.com; wilevades@yahoo.co.uk
Sent: Sat, 25 December, 2010 8:14:44
Subject: Re: Reply: [rti4empowerment] REQUEST TO USE RTI POWER TO INITIATE CONFISCATION OF CORRUPT POLITICIANS AGRICULTURAL LANDS UNDER KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT

Dear Weds Sri dhara & all
        On the front is corruption on the back is corruption in the
middle corruption every where there is only corruption.
          Thanks for enlightment
          Pl. Keep it up
          Regards
          Dr JN Sharma
          ADVOCATE/ HUMANRIGHTS ACTIVIST

On 12/25/10, DSouza Wilberious Evanglist <wilevades@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Dear Sridhara Babu,
>
> It was an absorbing conversation with you yesterday.
>
> The following is an e-mail  that I  sent  The New Indian Express who
> demurred to
> deliver it to Lokayukta or publish it,  about the corruption,
> maladministration
> in Karnataka Lokayukta despite rehetorie of Justice K Santhosh Hegde in
> press.
>
> I have attached the following files which please read at your lesuire. They
> are
> cent percent scientific & logical.
>
> The file Power of RTI is being edited & I shall send it to you later.
>
> 1. Wisdom by Scientific Facts.
> 2. RTI Act 2005 - how information Commissioners Should Function.
> 3. Blind Beliefd- Does God Exist!!!????
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> Accidentally I read at page 6 of The New Indian Express Friday, August 29,
> 2009
> Bangalore, a report titled There is Corruption at all Levels& also at page 6
> of
> The New Indian Express Saturday, August 30, 2009 Bangalore, another report
> titled Voice of People will help Lokayukta
>
> I was amused whether in both the statements wherein The Lokayukta, Hon'ble
> Justice K Santhosh Hegde stated so, to include The Karnataka Lokayuktatoo?
>
> It stands to reason to assume that these statements excluded The Lokayukta &
> The
> Karnataka Lokayukta. However, paradoxically & in fact they apply to both.
>
> Let me narrate my experience with The Karnataka Lokayukta.
>
> I addressed an application under RTI Act 2005 dated 23 03 2009 using the
> premise
> of deemed PIO as elucidated under section 5 (4 & 5) read with section 6
> (1&3),
> 22, 23 & 24 of RTI Act 2005 to The Lokayukta, Hon'ble Justice K. Santhosh
> Hegde
> by his proper name & sent it by professional courier Udupi on 26 03 2008 way
> bill nd.4688524.
>
> It was delivered to the addressee but, neither did I receive an
> acknowledgement
> nor the information sought. I talked to Registrar Moosa Kunhi, Dy. Registrar
> B.
> M. Mallikarjunaiah, & office of Asst. Registrar 8 (ARE 8) S. D. Parmaj to a
> lady
> who demurred to disclose her name despite being a public servant.
>
> Only after I sent a copy of that application again on 3rd July 2009, I
> received
> a reply dated. 27 07 2009.
>
>
> Does it not tantamount to disobedience of law as per section 166 of IPC 1860
> by
> the Lokayukta Hon'ble Justice K Santhosh Hegde?
>
> The information was sought on case COMPT/LOK/MYS191/2008 dated 19 12 2008
> which
> was recommended for closure by S.D. Parmaj, ARE 8 without even sending a
> letter
> enquiry against the respondent, the current Dy. Commissioner Udupi, P.
> Hemalatha
> IAS, recommending to The Lokayukta that it is a case against not providing
> information sought under RTI Act 2005 & is outside the purview of Lokayukta.
> The
> Lokayukta, Hon'ble Justice K. Santhosh Hegde, just as if he is a bureaucrat
> blindly endorsed the note by ARE 8, without even ever bothering to know what
> the
> complaint was about.
>
> My complaint was lucidly documented with unassailable & conclusive proof
> against
> Dy. Commissioner Udupi, P. Hemalatha I.A.S for abusing authority, acting
> ultra
> vires, violation of human right, transgressing her powers, disobedience of
> law
> making her liable under section 166 of IPC 1860. However, ARE 8 who is
> district
> & Sessions Judge (retd.), could not even display ordinary prudence &
> judgement
> to find a valid case in my complaint. An eloquent testimony to, absence of
> transparency, abuse of authority to favour one & harm another &
> maladministration in Karnataka Lokayukta logically leading to the conclusion
> of
> existence of corruption in The Karnataka Lokayukta itself.
>
>
> The same complaint against Dy. Commissioner Udupi, P.Hemalatha IAS on the
> same
> issue was filed with NHRC New Delhi for violation of my Human Rights has
> been
> adjudged as having a prima facie case by N.H.R.C & is under enquiry. Only
> the
> Lokayukta chose to exonerate her in my complaint without even an enquiry.
>
> Another complaint nd. COMPT/LOK/MYS193/2008 dated 19 12 2008 against former
> Dy.
> Commissioner Udupi, V. Ponnuraj I.A.S for abusing authority, disobeying law,
> acting arbitrarily filed with The Karnataka Lokayukta, also assigned to ARE
> 8,
> S.D. Parmaj, is yet to adjudicated.
>
>
> A complaint for human right violation has also been filed with NHRC New
> Delhi
> for violation of my Human Rights against former Dy. Commissioner Udupi, V.
> Ponnuraj I.A.S, has been adjudged as having a prima facie case by N.H.R.C &
> is
> under enquiry!
>
> I had sought status of both of my complaints as well as the course of action
> that would initiated by the Lokayukta to deliver justice to me, if not the
> reasons therefor, by an application under RTI Act 2005 section 6(1) at the
> time
> of filing complaint itself but, the information is yet to be received
> despite 7
> months! An eloquent testimony to lethargy & blatant disobedience of law,
> tantamount to maladministration in  Lokayukta which was established to
> oversee
> good governance! What a paradox! I am reminded of the vernacular saying
> "Baeli
> yeddu hola maidante?" {Fence that is designed to protect field from cattle,
> if
> by itself grazes the field?}
>
> I shall send a complaint against S.D. Parmaj, ARE 8, Karnataka Lokayukta, to
> Lokayukta. I shall observe how this shall be dealt with by Lokayukta. As a
> citizen & one of the governed, I have a right to demand transparency in
> functioning of every Public Authority. The Government & its
> instrumentalities
> are to be accountable to the governed after implementation of RTI Act 2005.
> We
> are a democratic nation where the GOVERNMENT IS BY A PEOPLE; OF THE PEOPLE &
> FOR
> THE PEOPLE!
>
> In another instance Udupi Town Police station ASI refused to accept my
> complaint
> under sections 268,269,270,339,425 & 426 of IPC 1860, disobedience of duty
> enjoined by Article 51A of Constitution with offence relevant to
>
> (a)  Offences against the State.
> (b)  Offences against the public tranquility.
> (d)  Offences affecting life.
> (i)  Offences of mischief against property.
>
> Every public office has this displayed on a board:
>
> In case of under delay or harassment caused by an official or public servant
> in
> attending to official work the same may be brought to the notice of under:
>
> Registrar Karnata Lokayukta, M. S. Building, Dr. Ambedkar Veethi, Bangalore
> 56001.
>
> Encouraged by this, I called Lokayukta to complain to Registrar Karnata
> Lokayukta. Registrar Moosa Kunhi was not at his desk. The lady in his office
> did
> not know where he was. When I narrated why I called, the lady said "We do
> not do
> anything, you have to contact the local Lokayukta Office" When I asked why
> the
> board should be displayed as stating above, there was no answer. Lady did
> not
> disclose her name. I had contacted the Circle Police Inspector Udupi, Ganesh
> Hegde & narrated him the incident. As he was at Mangalore undergoing
> training, I
> requested him to advice Town Police Station Udupi & re-approached ASI
> informing
> him my talk with CIP, who accepted it.
>
>
> In the meantime I had talked to Dy. SP Lokayukta Udupi, Prabhudev Bimane to
> persuade police to initiate action.
>
> This is the state of affaires of The Karnataka Lokayukta claiming overseeing
> of
> good governance! Probably the dictum is "DO WHAT I SAY BUT, DON'T DO AS I
> DO"
>
> Will The New Indian Express be intrepid to deliver this to Lolayukta Hon'ble
> Justice K Santhosh Hegde?
>
> Regards,
> WEDS
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: sridhara babu <legaldocumentations@yahoo.co.in>
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com; rtiyashada@gmail.co; Karnataka Intiative
> RTI
> <thekirti@yahoogroups.com>; rti4empowerment@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Fri, 24 December, 2010 11:42:36
> Subject: [rti4empowerment] REQUEST TO USE RTI POWER TO INITIATE CONFISCATION
> OF
> CORRUPT POLITICIANS AGRICULTURAL LANDS UNDER KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT
>
>
>
> DEAR
>
> RTI ACTIVISTS OF KARNATAKA
>
> KINDLY READ THE ANNEXED ARTICLE IT GIVES YOU IDEA TO  INITIATE CONFISCATION
> PROCEEDINGS BEFORE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONERS AGAINST  CORRUPT POLITICIANS
> AGRICULTURAL LANDS UNDER KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT.
>
>
> SRIDHARA BABU N
> ADVOCATE
> FOUNDER PRESIDENT: HUMAN RIGHTS AND ANTI-CORRUPTION FOUNDATION (R)
> EXECUTIVE PRESIDENT OF TUMKUR DISTRICT: ALL INDIA LAWYERS UNION (AILU)
> LEGAL DOCUMENTATIONS
> G.K.ROAD, K.R.EXTENSION
> TUMKUR, KARNATAKA, INDIA
> PH:9880339764
> http://sridharababu.blogspot.com
>
>
>