Friday, December 24, 2010

Re: [HumJanenge] Re: COMMENTS / OBJECTIONS / SUGGESTIONS : ref:PN/DoPT/OM/2010/RTI/AAA-0000-013

Mr Roy
 
You can only talk of loaded revolvers. But atleast the prefix you have righlty used to my name should indicate that you are communicating with one who has handled many of those devices!
 
Anyhow, your reply is absolutely absurd and hence totally ignored. But one request- never lie. Ignorance is not a crime but wilful lying can have disasterous consequences.
 
regards n bw
 
ravi

 
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:56 PM, sroy1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Major Ravi

1) Giving loaded revolvers to children is the height of
irresponsibility. Similarly telling you where the RTI Act mandates
presence of appellant in every appeal proceeding would be equally
irresponsible on my part.

2) Just for this record, the declared purpose of this group (ie.
Humjanege @ google). is "To expose and remove all obstacles to the RTI
movement such as corrupt Information Commissioners and fake RTI NGOs
like the NCPRI."

3) We shall leave it to history to decide who are the devils and who
are the prostitutes. You have already declared which camp you are in.

Sarbajit

On Dec 24, 12:25 pm, Ravindran P M <pmravind...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mr Roy
>
> I have heard enough of prostitutes talking of chastity and devils quoting
> scriptures. Now I can also add sarabjit roy talking of rti!
>
> But just for the records: please let me know where the hell in the RTI Act
> is it mentioned that appellant must be present etc.as you have claimed.
>
> May God save this country from thick headed people like you.
>
> regards n bw
>
> ravi

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.