[HumJanenge] RE: COMMENTS / OBJECTIONS / SUGGESTIONS : ref:PN/DoPT/OM/2010/RTI/AAA-0000-013

I fully agree to it.

Capt. Saibal Ghosh
-----Original Message-----
From: M.K. Gupta
Sent: 24/12/2010, 16:16
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: COMMENTS / OBJECTIONS / SUGGESTIONS : ref:PN/DoPT/OM/2010/RTI/AAA-0000-013

Major Ravi has a deep knowledge of RTI Act and implications of its different
provisions.  In the past, he has suggested some good amendments to the Act
favouring the public.

Use of ugly words like prostitutes etc. does not behove for this esteemed group
and I appeal Mr Roy to exercise some restraint while writing any thing about
other members. If v want that v should get respect from others, v should first
learn to give respect to them.

Without calling names, v shld constraint on the main issue without any
deviation.

________________________________
From: sroy1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com>
To: HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005
<HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Fri, 24 December, 2010 2:56:22 PM
Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: COMMENTS / OBJECTIONS / SUGGESTIONS :
ref:PN/DoPT/OM/2010/RTI/AAA-0000-013

Dear Major Ravi

1) Giving loaded revolvers to children is the height of
irresponsibility. Similarly telling you where the RTI Act mandates
presence of appellant in every appeal proceeding would be equally
irresponsible on my part.

2) Just for this record, the declared purpose of this group (ie.
Humjanege @ google). is "To expose and remove all obstacles to the RTI
movement such as corrupt Information Commissioners and fake RTI NGOs
like the NCPRI."

3) We shall leave it to history to decide who are the devils and who
are the prostitutes. You have already declared which camp you are in.

Sarbajit

On Dec 24, 12:25 pm, Ravindran P M <pmravind...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mr Roy
>
> I have heard enough of prostitutes talking of chastity and devils quoting
> scriptures. Now I can also add sarabjit roy talking of rti!
>
> But just for the records: please let me know where the hell in the RTI Act
> is it mentioned that appellant must be present etc.as you have claimed.
>
> May God save this country from thick headed people like you.
>
> regards n bw
>
> ravi