If I did so, then how would I (or this group) be different from the
haramis ? In any case, this group has a surfeit of lions who are up to
the task.
Sarbajit
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Baby Varkey <babyjohn.varkey@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Sarbajit Roy
>
> I completely agree with you on the last 2 points
>
> The Right to Information Act, 2005 and the operative rules are in
> urgent need of amendment.
>
> I urge you to do whatever you can to ensure that citizen friendly
> rules are notified as soon as possible. You may consider if a response
> drafted by you to the draft amendment to RTI Rules can be submitted on
> behalf of the members of this group.
>
> Baby Varkey, Adv.
>
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:57 PM, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In one of his last orders as CIC, Mr Wajahat Habibullah had referred
>> to my posts on various RTI blogs and sanctified the term 'RTI haramis'
>> in his order.
>>
>> Mr Habibullah had also carefully clarified that Shekhar Singh stood in
>> as equal a "friendship" with him as I did (which we all know to be a
>> blatant lie).
>>
>> Now Mr Habibullah has (again) revealed his true nature as
>> a) a scrounger off the scraps which fall from Sonia Gandhi's table(s)
>> b) a traitor to the Transparency cause (ie. an RTI harami) along with
>> his massively foreign financed ex-babu friends like Aruna Roy and
>> Shekhar Singh, .
>>
>> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/7120033.cms
>>
>> This shows us how the NCPRI/NAC/Congress mafia operates. A few high
>> leaders (traitors) draft everything and then present it to the general
>> body to rubber stamp (ratify). Does this sound familiar ?
>>
>> Now the question is what do citizens want ?
>>
>> 1) AMEND the RTI Act and resolve all those grey areas which could
>> never be addressed while Mr Habibullah was placed there.
>> 2) AMEND the RTI Rules the same way
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.