Re: [HumJanenge] Habibullah sits at the high table of RTI haramis

I dont think anyone here is interested in RTI anymore.

RTI has been flogged to death, and only the vested interests
are left on this group..

Baby Varkey wrote:
> OK then the 2 of us can file it jointly.
>
> I've uploaded my revisions to your draft for Rule 2 to the website forum
> http://humjanenge.org.in/news/citizen-journalism/amendment-to-rti-rules/
>
> If anybody else wants to pitch in / help us out / join up with the 2 of us,
> then register at the website. We are now working on Rules 3 and 4.
>
> Baby Varkey.
>
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 5:07 PM, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>"You may consider if a response drafted by you to the draft amendment to RTI Rules can be submitted on behalf of the members of this group."
> >
> > If I did so, then how would I (or this group) be different from the
> > haramis ? In any case, this group has a surfeit of lions who are up to
> > the task.
> >
> > Sarbajit
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Baby Varkey <babyjohn.varkey@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Dear Mr. Sarbajit Roy
> >>
> >> I completely agree with you on the last 2 points
> >>
> >> The Right to Information Act, 2005 and the operative rules are in
> >> urgent need of amendment.
> >>
> >> I urge you to do whatever you can to ensure that citizen friendly
> >> rules are notified as soon as possible. You may consider if a response
> >> drafted by you to the draft amendment to RTI Rules can be submitted on
> >> behalf of the members of this group.
> >>
> >> Baby Varkey, Adv.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:57 PM, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> In one of his last orders as CIC, Mr Wajahat Habibullah had referred
> >>> to my posts on various RTI blogs and sanctified the term 'RTI haramis'
> >>> in his order.
> >>>
> >>> Mr Habibullah had also carefully clarified that Shekhar Singh stood in
> >>> as equal a "friendship" with him as I did (which we all know to be a
> >>> blatant lie).
> >>>
> >>> Now Mr Habibullah has (again) revealed his true nature as
> >>> a) a scrounger off the scraps which fall from Sonia Gandhi's table(s)
> >>> b) a traitor to the Transparency cause (ie. an RTI harami) along with
> >>> his massively foreign financed ex-babu friends like Aruna Roy and
> >>> Shekhar Singh, .
> >>>
> >>> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/7120033.cms
> >>>
> >>> This shows us how the NCPRI/NAC/Congress mafia operates. A few high
> >>> leaders (traitors) draft everything and then present it to the general
> >>> body to rubber stamp (ratify). Does this sound familiar ?
> >>>
> >>> Now the question is what do citizens want ?
> >>>
> >>> 1) AMEND the RTI Act and resolve all those grey areas which could
> >>> never be addressed while Mr Habibullah was placed there.
> >>> 2) AMEND the RTI Rules the same way
> >>>
> >>> Sarbajit
> >>>
> >>
> >