Re: [HumJanenge] COMMENTS / OBJECTIONS / SUGGESTIONS : ref:PN/DoPT/OM/2010/RTI/AAA-0000-011

OK. Got it !

RTIwanted

---

From: sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, December 21, 2010 7:35:36 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] COMMENTS / OBJECTIONS / SUGGESTIONS : ref:PN/DoPT/OM/2010/RTI/AAA-0000-011

I wrote "Accordingly I SUGGEST that the term "alongwith" be suitably
replaced with "accompany" as in the parent Act."

the operative portion is "as in the parent Act" and not "in the parent Act"

So my way is right.

I am suggesting that "alongwith" be replaced in the RULES by
"accompany" as in the parent Act. Emphasis on "as"

On 12/21/10, C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Mr Sarbajit,
>
> There seems to be a error in your following statement in email 011.
>
> It should actually be the other way around:
>
> Accordingly I SUGGEST that the term :"accompany" be suitably replaced with
> "alongwith" as in the parent Act.
>
> RTIwanted
>
>
> ________________________________
> From:Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> To:usrti-dopt@nic.in
> Sent:Tue, December 21, 2010 1:25:45 PM
> Subject:[HumJanenge] COMMENTS / OBJECTIONS / SUGGESTIONS :
> ref:PN/DoPT/OM/2010/RTI/AAA-0000-011
>
>
>
> Accordingly I SUGGEST that the term :"alongwith" be suitably replaced with
> "accompany" as in the parent Act.
>
>
>