These news if true and substantiated must come out in public domain. But the way they trickle out only just to to titilate the thinking of people. I am all against corruption but not like this. If it had some base would congress not have pursued the case during the UPA regime or even during 2014 elections. I am not a blind supporter
By PARANJOY GUHA THAKURTA | 18 November 2016
The documents, which have been doing the rounds in New Delhi for the last few months, suggest that during his tenure as chief minister of Gujarat, Modi—along with a number of important politicians—was paid large amounts of cash by individuals associated with Subrata Roy, the founder-chairman of the Sahara India Group.
These documents also suggest that the recipients of such favours included, among others: Shivraj Singh Chouhan, the chief minister of Madhya Pradesh; Raman Singh, the chief minister of Chhattisgarh; Shaina NC, the treasurer for the Bharatiya Janata party in Maharashtra and; Sheila Dikshit, the former chief minister of Delhi.
After documents are seized by income tax officials during a raid, these are examined and evaluated by a different officer who then prepares a detailed "appraisal report" outlining the possible future course of action. According to a report by Ritu Sarin and Pragya Kaushika, published in the Indian Express on 16 November, a voluminous appraisal report running into "thousands of pages" on the papers pertaining to Sahara has been prepared and is being looked into by an assessment officer.
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.
Saturday, November 19, 2016
Re: [IAC#RG] Did Modi receive over Rs 55 crore from the Sahara Group asthe chief minister of Gujarat?
I entirely agree with Shri Abhishek Singh , and support the demonetization move by our Prime Minister whole heartedly and unconditionally. The intention behind the move was to give a hard blow to those who had been accumulating black money by avoiding tax payments, and also to those supporting terrorism using counterfeit notes; who now suddenly find themselves short of cash. Incidentally, there does not seem to be much stone throwing in Srinagar after 8th November. It is unfortunate that some individuals are trying to tarnish our PMs reputation by making unsubstantiated allegations of corruption against him. Please consider this- would Subroto Roy still be in Tihar if he had paid 55 Crores to Shri Narendra Modi (as alleged)?
There is an e mail input suggesting that corrupted journalists or individuals have infiltrated IAC, and this may have been unwarranted. They may not be corrupt, but only expressing their opinion (in my view misguided). Similarly, Dr Kameshwar Elangbam was only expressing his opinion . Just as another individual was expressing his opinion when calling our Prime Minister, elected by an overwhelming majority, " a rogue of the highest order". It says much for our freedom of speech that we can make such statements with impunity. This is not a sign of a FASCIST regime. Or is it ?
I request all to be moderate in their language.
Anand S Gangoli
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 11:42 AM, vijoy Ambasta <email@example.com> wrote: