Thursday, February 7, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] Request for "suo-moto" information dissemination u/s 4(1)(c) RTI Act 2005

Dear Dr George

Information under sec 4 are required to be mandatorily disclosed by all pubic authorities and published for the ready consumption of the public. So the question of the application fee does not arise. In fact compliance with this section alone would reduce the number of applications very much. But unfortunately even the information commission have failed to comply with it even after seven and a half years of the law being in force! And this is certainly a cause for serious concern.

regards n bw

ravi

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, DR MC GEORGE <drgeorgemanayan@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
          Hello friends
            A right step at the right time. May I clear my doubt regarding the statutory requirement of minimum fee - Rs.10/- - for entertaining the petititon under RTI Act?. Please clear my doubt in this regard so that I could also follow.
Dr.M.C.GEORGE,ADVOCATE,INFAM(IndianFarmersMovement)NationalTrustee.

--- On Thu, 7/2/13, rb purohit <rbpurohit4productivity@gmail.com> wrote:

From: rb purohit <rbpurohit4productivity@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Request for "suo-moto" information dissemination u/s 4(1)(c) RTI Act 2005
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Date: Thursday, 7 February, 2013, 7:34 AM


Dear Sarbajitji
The President signs on the dotted lines whatever is written by the cabinet on his behalf.
Ask the Parliament to question the Cabinet for TRUNCATED QUICK ACT.
Ratanlal Purohit
On 07-Feb-2013 12:25 AM, "Sarbajit Roy" <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Shri Saurabh Vijay,
(Central Public Information Officer)
The President's Secretariat,
Rashtrapati Bhavan,
New Delhi-110004


Date: 07-Feb-2013
BY EMAIL
Sir,
Sub: Request for "suo-moto" information u/s 4(1)(c) RTI Act 2005 in larger public interest.
I am sending this email seeking information u/s 4(1)(c) of the RTI Act on behalf of the subscribers to India Against Corruption jan andolan.
I refer to the Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance 2013, or suchlike, approved by his Eminence the Hon'ble President of India very recently, and which contained, inter-alia, the following text in its preamble.
"AND WHEREAS Parliament is not in session and the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action to give effect to the provisions of the said Bill with certain modifications;"
Accordingly, the subscribers of India Against Corruption people's movement would like to be properly informed about the specific and exact circumstances, based on the records,  which existed rendering it necessary for the Hon'ble President of India to act immediately to give effect to the provisions of the Bill cited.
It is pertinent to mention that India Against Corruption had responded to the public notice issued for the Justice J.S.Verma Committee on Criminal Law amendments to ensure safety of women against sexual assault, and we are interested in everything connected with the process of amending the Criminal Laws of India to ensure the safety of women.
I would be obliged if the information is urgently conveyed to me by return email in view of the large public interest involved. Alternatively, it is requested that the same may kindly be uploaded to your website, under intimation to the undersigned,  for wide dissemination.
Looking forward to your reply
yours faithfully

( Sarbajit Roy )
National Convenor,
India Against Corruption,
B-59 Defence Colony,
New Delhi 110024
Tel : 09311448069

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Veteran Major P M Ravindran
 
You may also like to visit:
'Judiciary Watch' at www.vigilonline.com 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.