Re: [HumJanenge] MAKE WILD ALLEGATIONS AND GET T V SPACE

You are right. These are not allegations. If even one-tenth of these allegations were made against you or me, we would be in jail. So why one law for citizens and another for others? --- On Fri, 10/19/12, Mr. Hemant Kshirsagar <hemantkshirsagar01@gmail.com> wrote: From: Mr. Hemant Kshirsagar <hemantkshirsagar01@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] MAKE WILD ALLEGATIONS AND GET T V SPACE To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Cc: indiaagainstcorruption@lists.riseup.net Date: Friday, October 19, 2012, 11:39 PM Mr, SD Sharma, Your mail really does leaves a bad taste, please do not mention the caste on such portal. Please can you do one big favor simply do something on such scale, where even the kids know about your achievements. If you are smart enough, then please work for our country and do not try to pull the other persons legs. Why always some irrelevant, small person who no one has heard about and has no public life comment on the other people who are enjoying themselves. Such enjoyment may be bad or good but atleast they have bones to fight for themselves for personal or public reasons. Some of IPS persons on the portal are shamelessly stating that they know some facts, If you are a IPS officer, aren't you ashamed for the boneless body you have, as you stood there without any action. It is easier to sit and comment, it is always better to have your actions known to the people then only your words. Then let *Fill your caste*  will earn more money. Regards, Hemant K On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 9:49 AM, IAC INFO <info.indiaagainstcorruption@gmail.com> wrote: It is stated the contents of the email received below are defamatory in nature and tone requiring the author to apologise unconditionally and the said apology be also published on the information mailing list "indiaagainstcorruption@lists.riseup.net" On 10/19/12, "S.D. Sharma" <anonsharma@yahoo.com> wrote > > *Questions we must all ask today * > > Is India only a nation of *banias* ? > Is "India Against Corruption" a "*bania*" organisation ? > > *Gandhis, Bhushans, Kejriwals --- banias all* > Can these *bania* traders and money minded profiteering persons be depended > to lead a violent freedom movement against imperialism ? > > *Can India trust them ?* > http://www.firstpost.com/india/can-we-trust-iac-activist-anjali-damanias-allegations-495940.html > > *What do we ask from them ?* > Raise the money to get us what we need to get the job done. > > *Should we feed 1000 sheep or feed 1 LION ?* > > *Profile of a LOIN, (a unique bania who became a LION)* > > *AMIR CHAND, MASTER:* b. 1869 at Delhi, son of Shri Hukam Chand Vaishya; > School teacher; Took active part in social reform and educational > activities, such as widow remarriage, temperance and spread of education. > Prominent worker in the Swadeshi Movement. Contact with the famous > revolutionary leader, Lala Har Dayal, brought him into the revolutionary > movement. Became leader of the Ghadar Party. Worked in close colla­boration > with Rash Behari Bose and directed revolutionary activities in the whole of > northern India. Arrested in February 1914 on the charge of conspiracy to > kill Lord Hardinge, the Viceroy of India, and also accused of of complicity > in the Lahore Bomb Case. Known as the Delhi Conspiracy Case, it started > with the throwing of a bomb on Lord Hardinge while he was passing on an > elephant through Delhi's Chandni Chowk in State procession marking the > inauguration of Delhi as the Capital of India. Sentenced to death on > October 5, 1914, along with his three compatriots-­Avadh Bihari, Bal Mokand > and Basant Kumar Biswas. Died on the gallows on May 8, 1915, in the Delhi > Central Jail. > > Source: *'Who's Who of Indian Martyrs'  published by HRD Ministry* > > *S D Sharma* > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:32 AM, login yahoogroups < > login.yahoogroups@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear Jasvir Singhji >> Theres no use educating these people. As ex-IPS we both know the facts. >> >> Q: Who finances & controls Kejriwala, YPS, bhushans and medha patkar,  ? >> A: Mulayam singh and Subrato Rai "Sahara". >> >> Mr Aklesh yadhav may act he does to know "Who is Arvind Kejriwal ?" >> >> http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-10-07/lucknow/34305643_1_akhilesh-yadav-samajwadi-party-azam-khan >> but all persons present at the meeting burst into laughter because it >> is an open secret especially to honest officers who face their abuses >> on daily basis >> >> sahara group and SP want SP(Muslim)/BJP(bania/brahmin) combination in >> UP for 2013/14 >> >> http://www.rediff.com/news/report/saharas-sensational-up-polls-survey-creates-ripples/20120126.htm >> >> Who benefits if land deals in Haryana (NCR-Gurgaon Manesar) come under >> cloud of suspicion by Vadhra expose ? obviously Uttar Pradesh for NCR >> deals in Noida and Greater Noida. Which UP developers benefit if DLF >> (which has hardly any dealing in UP) is blackened - JP, 3C, Ponty >> Chadha .... >> >> Who benefits if YPS exposes Lavassa hill project ? obviously Sahara >> who has his competing Amby Valley hill project >> >> Who benefits in UP if Salman Khurshid is exposed ? obviously SP/BJP >> axis in Uttar.Pradesh. >> >> Who is India's biggest private banker to politicians ? >> Who moves money to Kejriwal ? >> Whose TV network OB vans  moves Kejriwal from meeting to meeting ? >> Who has to repay 3000 crores with 15% interest and doesn't have it ? >> Who prints more indian money than RBI ? >> >> S D Sharma >> >> From: Jasvir Singh <jasvir70@gmail.com> >> >> > Dear Venkataraman, >> >                                   There is a great merit in your views >> and >> > it raises the big question. In fact very few have been talking about >> > exposing corruption in the media and private sectors. Media houses >> > being >> > controlled by corrupt corporate houses and politico-dynastic families >> > are >> > quietly playing the games and the so called civil society is crawling >> > to >> > get tv space at any cost. Some of the allegations may be correct too, >> > but >> > how will media exposure address the root causes especially when there >> > is >> > little empirical evidence to demonstrate that is something to be >> > further >> > debated.  Well said. >> > >> >> regards >> jasvir >> >