Re: [HumJanenge] Interesting order

What is the logic to put over four years old order now?  The IC has not ordered to give the salary of PIO the appellant.  The concluding para mentioned below is self-speaking: 10. The Commission also orders that the complainant, Shri Kumar Avikal Manu, should be paid adequate compensation, which should be equal to the amount of the salary and allowances already paid to the third and last appointee in the group of four physically handicapped candidates, who were offered the job on the basis of UPSC recommendation. The complainant being the 4th person who has, however, been denied the prestigious offer vide letter no.13015/1/2005- AIS(1) dated December 21, 2006, communicating that he could not be appointed for want of the vacancy in any Govt. Department. The total amount thus payable to the complainant should be determined on the basis of the date of joining of the third and last candidate in the physically handicapped category till December 21, 2006, the date of DoPT's order of denial of his dream job, as an IAS officer. The entire amount thus calculated should be paid to him in one installment by way of demand draft in favour of the appellant, Shri Kumar Avikal Manu, before March 31, 2007, failing which penal interest @ 10% per annum on the total payable amount would be applicable. --- On Sun, 10/7/11, sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com> wrote: From: sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com> Subject: [HumJanenge] Interesting order To: "humjanenge" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>, "HC Arora" <hcarora.highcourt@gmail.com>, "hitenderjain" <hitenderjain@gmail.com>, "Kuldeep Singh Khaira" <kuldeepsingh_khaira@yahoo.com>, "right2justice" <right2justice@gmail.com>, "lsa_ludhiana" <lsa_ludhiana@yahoo.com> Date: Sunday, 10 July, 2011, 6:41 AM Please find an interesting order of the CIC in which PA was ordered to pay salary to the appellant. -- Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA Phone: 91-99929-31181