violation of its orders. after some time ask cic under rti about the
course of action on your complaint.
On 4/22/11, Abhijit Mehta <abhijit@abhijitmehta.com> wrote:
> In all fairness Sarbjit I do not see anyone answering his query.
>
> In fact i see very little of RTI and more personality based
> discussions.(ofcourse I not even a month in this group)
>
> Regards
>
> Abhijit Mehta
>
>
> The Best Is Yet To Come
>
> God Bless
>
> On 22-Apr-2011, at 9:18 AM, sarbajit roy wrote:
>
>> Dear Madhukar
>>
>> What kind of RTI activist are you if you dont know the answer to your
>> question ?
>>
>> In any case, putting queries to our members without giving all the
>> facts..is an abuse of this group's limited bandwidth and resources.
>>
>> Kindly frame your query in terms of section 20 of RTI Act and repost
>> it to this group. We are all here to help members like you (and
>> despite the fact you are an activist)
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>> On Apr 21, 9:25 pm, "punenagrikmanch ." <punenagrikma...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> I had filled the 2nd appeal and the hearing just over, as i didnt get
>>> the information in time, i got the information after 8 months and
>>> which is also not correct. now as per the law, the PRO should be
>>> punished or penalised, but i dont think so it will be done.
>>>
>>> what i should do further?
>>>
>>> regrads
>>>
>>> Madhukar Mazire
>>> RTI activist
>
>
--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.