Re: [HumJanenge] Info on cars registerd in the MV dept in 2009

As I had posted, "licences" are indeed authorisations, but
"registrations" are not.

Sarbajit

On 1/16/11, sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com> wrote:
> are licenses and registrations not authorizations? the particulars of
> recipients of permits, authorizations means the details of owners. I
> think this information is in public domain.
>
> On 1/16/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't see how it falls under 4.1.b.xiii.
>>
>> The said clause speaks of RECIPIENTS of a) concessions b) permits c)
>> authorisations.
>>
>> The Motor Vehicles Act clearly distinguishes "permits" from "licences"
>> and "registrations"
>> So whereas the local STA.must publish say the list of all "permits"
>> say for operating stage carriages between Point A and Point B, and
>> also the list of all authorisations (licence) to drive motor vehicles,
>> there is no such provision to publish the list of owners of all motor
>> vehicles "registered" with it. Usually though there is a clause in the
>> parent law that such statutory registers are open to inspection under
>> specified conditions.
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:09 AM, sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> The information demanded by you comes under proactive disclosure
>>> (section 4(1)(b)(xiii). but under this subsection you can demand
>>> information related to all the vehicles registered in 2009. the PIO
>>> can refuse to supply the information related to cars specifically
>>> quoting section 7(9). You have two options now: either demand
>>> information required to be published under section 4(1)(b)(xii) and
>>> (xiii) or move high court taking the plea of non publishing of
>>> information under proactive disclosure.
>>> simply ask the following in fresh form A;
>>>
>>> Please provide me the details related to the manner of execution of
>>> subsidy programmes, including the amounts allocated and the details of
>>> beneficiaries of all such programmes; This information be supplied for
>>> the period from 01.01.2006 to the date of supplying this information;
>>>
>>>
>>> Please provide me the particulars of recipients of concessions,
>>> permits or authorisations granted by your office during the period
>>> from 01.01.2006 to the date of supplying this information;
>>>
>>> Demand the above information in the form of CD and also request them
>>> to publish it reminding them that this information was mandated to be
>>> published under section 4(1)(b).
>>> most probably the PIO will respond that this information is nil.
>>> then in the first appeal again remind the AA.
>>> then in the commission, demand the action from the commission to order
>>> the respondent to implement section 4.
>>> regards
>>> sandeep
>>>
>>> On 1/12/11, Ashok R. Mansata <ashokaol@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear Friends,
>>>> I had made an application to the Motor Vehicles Dept asking them for the
>>>> names and addresses of all the persons who had purchased cars in 2009
>>>> and
>>>> registered them in the MV Dept. However the information was refused.
>>>> Even
>>>> on
>>>> a second appeal before the State Info Commissioner, the Info was denied
>>>> to
>>>> me.
>>>> Please advise:
>>>> a) Wes the tate Chief Info Commissioner justified in denying me the
>>>> info?
>>>> b) What is the remedy before me?
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ashok
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
>>> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
>>> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>