can identify the owner of the vehicles for prosecutions and compliance
with the provisios of the MV Act.
Unlike the case of permits and licences, registration pertains to the
vehicle
and not to the individual. Ownership of the vehicle is independent of
registration and flows from contractual elements between the buyer
and seller. Non-registration does not take away ownership / liability.
For example I can purchase a car, not get it registered and lock it up
never to drive it on the roads. I would continue to be the owner since
I
have fulfilled the contractual elements and paid the consideration.
In any case, and as I have said previously, permits, licences and
registrations are defined in the parent MV Act. The first 2 need
to be disclosed u/s 4, the third does not.
Sarbajit
On Jan 17, 7:36 am, sandeep kumar <drsandgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> sir, I beg to differ, Is it not permit to claim ownership of vehicle?
>
> On 1/16/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > As I had posted, "licences" are indeed authorisations, but
> > "registrations" are not.
>
> > Sarbajit
>
> > On 1/16/11, sandeep kumar <drsandgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> are licenses and registrations not authorizations? the particulars of
> >> recipients of permits, authorizations means the details of owners. I
> >> think this information is in public domain.
>
> >> On 1/16/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> I don't see how it falls under 4.1.b.xiii.
>
> >>> The said clause speaks of RECIPIENTS of a) concessions b) permits c)
> >>> authorisations.
>
> >>> The Motor Vehicles Act clearly distinguishes "permits" from "licences"
> >>> and "registrations"
> >>> So whereas the local STA.must publish say the list of all "permits"
> >>> say for operating stage carriages between Point A and Point B, and
> >>> also the list of all authorisations (licence) to drive motor vehicles,
> >>> there is no such provision to publish the list of owners of all motor
> >>> vehicles "registered" with it. Usually though there is a clause in the
> >>> parent law that such statutory registers are open to inspection under
> >>> specified conditions.
>
> >>> Sarbajit
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.