The purpose of this group [HumJanenge] is to discuss RTI and related
issues seriously and in a democratic manner. Therefore kindly do not
append external links or personal contact details to promote yourself
in messages posted to this group.
PMK
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:53 PM, indu prakash singh <indupragya@gmail.com> wrote:
> if they have nothing to hide then should put up their assets for public
> knowledge.
>
> i've come to a conclusion that the biggest problem in our country is
> bureaucracy. Totally unaccountable.
>
> Really shameful!
>
> Let's not accord them the respect we give them.
>
> satyameva jayte!
>
> indu prakash singh
> Mobile: +91 9911362925
>
> Check under www.amazon.com, www.loc.gov,
> for the listing of indu's books on women of India (under his full name).
>
> Alternate Email ID: indumanav@yahoo.com
>
> Website:
> www.igsss.org;
> www.mynews.in;
> www.praxisindia.org;
> www.judicialreforms.org;
> www.pardadapardadi.org;
> www.gandhiking.ning.com;
> www.induprakashsingh.com;
> www.citizenjournalistawards.com
> http://www.cgnetswara.org/
> http://www.frontline.in/stories/20101022272108400.htm
> http://photophilanthropy.org/blogmedia/gallery-posts/in-search-of-a-roof/.
>
> Commonwealth Games: Poor banished from public spaces, India ...
>
> http://www.4to40.com/newsat4/index.asp?p=Poor_banished_from_public_spaces
> http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_where-have-the-beggars-in-delhi-gone_1446859
> http://www.hindustantimes.com/Where-have-the-beggars-in-Delhi-gone/Article1-607577.aspx
> http://www.hinduonnet.com/2010/01/05/stories/2010010550700200.htm
> http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1923/stories/20021122004703000.htm
> http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/stateplan/sdr_pdf/shdr_del06.pdf
> http://website1.wider.unu.edu/conference/conference-2003-2/conference%202003-2-papers/papers-pdf/Harriss-White%20260303.pdf
> http://www.cgnetswara.org/index.php?tag=Subhash
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peFHthxPFz8
>
> Explore yourself, and you will find everyone, in yourself
>
>
> On 8 November 2010 09:30, vishalkudchadkar <humjanenge.owner@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> http://www.hindustantimes.com/IAS-wary-of-declaring-its-officers-assets/Article1-623199.aspx
>>
>> When it comes to transparency, the country's elite class, the Indian
>> Administrative Service (IAS), has shied away from disclosing
>> information about their assets. However, lesser mortals such as the
>> Indian Forests Service (IFS) and Indian Police Service (IPS) have no
>> problems with the disclosure.
>>
>> The government had recently asked the three services — IAS, IFS and
>> IPS — whether they would want to reveal assets of its officials under
>> the Right To Information Act.
>>
>> Although the IAS officers failed to respond even after four months,
>> IPS and IFS officers agreed to the idea.
>>
>> The IPS and IFS were prompt with their agreement, but the IAS failed
>> to submit its opinion, despite reminders.
>>
>> "Our officers have nothing to hide," said a former office-bearer of
>> the IFS Officers' Association in Delhi. "We want that people should
>> know how much we earn as compared to other services even though we all
>> clear the same (civil service) examination."
>>
>> The question came after Supreme Court judges and Union council of
>> ministers agreed to divulge their assets, and the Central Information
>> Commission wanted to know about the services' opinion.
>>
>> Although it is among the most powerful services in the country's
>> administrative network — over 90% of secretary levels posts in the
>> central government are with the IAS officers — the IAS is reluctant on
>> transparency, especially about information of personal kind.
>>
>> The IAS officers' association said it was not against transparency,
>> but wanted to adopt a more democratic process to adopt a key change.
>> Therefore, the association has sought views of all state-level
>> associations, unlike the national bodies for other two services, which
>> decided at their own level.
>>
>> Though the information sought is already with the government, the law
>> says such information can be disclosed only after the officials
>> concerned consent to make it public.
>>
>> Until now, only select IAS officers have permitted disclosure of their
>> assets.
>>
>> Even retired IAS officers who were re-employed, were reluctant to
>> allow public's assess to information about their assets. None of the
>> retired IAS officers in the CIC, and the Election Commission, agreed
>> to put their assets on the commissions' websites saying "no government
>> rule prescribes such declaration".
>
>
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.