Dear Mr. Venkatesh Nayahk
You left out "1(2) (2) It extends to the whole of India."
The "place" has to be within India. Is Googlegroups a "place" ?
Who has "burnt, mutilated, defaced, defiled, disfigured, destroyed, trampled upon or otherwise brought into contempt" the Constitution of India or the Flag.
In any case our moderator PMK would gladly be a martyr if EQUAL action was taken
against your traitor friends like Arundhati Roy, SRS Geelani etc. for their public comments made in Jammu and Kashmir (is it not a part of India ?) which are much much worse than what PMK has written. They know how to extract every last drop of publicity by claiming to be patriots seeking the AMENDMENT of India's Constitution to give AZAADI to Kashmir, thus taking their offence out of the purview of National Honours Act. They have expert advocates like Prasanth Bhushan, Colin Gonsalves , Maya Daruwala to help them escape punishment by twisting the law and by the help of their friends in NAC who get Home Minister to drop IPC proceedings against them..
You have no right to speak on such matters of patriotism. As employee of UK NGO and getting your salary from Government of UK. before posting such messages to this group have you ever similarly publicly condemned Arundhati Roy or Krishnaraj Rao (who sings national anthem in public chambers of SCIC while court proceeding are in progress)
sd/-
1. Dr Durgesh Nandan Agrawal
2. S.D.Sharma
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:13 AM, venkatesh nayak
<nayak.venkatesh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all, especially Mr. Moderator,
> This is an extract from The Prevention Of Insults To National Honor Act,
> 1971.Act No. 69 Of 1971:
>
>
>
> "2. Insult to Indian National Flag and Constitution of India.
> Whoever in any public place or in any other place within public view burns,
> mutilates, defaces, defiles, disfigures, destroys, tramples upon or
> otherwise brings into contempt (whether by words, either spoken or written,
> or by acts) the Indian National Flag or the
> Constitution of India or any part thereof, shall be punished with
> imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or
> with both.
>
> Explanation 1.-Comments expressing disapprobation or criticism of the
> Constitution or of the Indian National Flag or of any measures of the
> Government with a view to obtain an amendment of the Constitution of India
> or an alteration of the Indian National Flag by lawful means do not
> constitute an offence under this section."
>
> First of many of us did not opt to become members of this new RTI group.
> Mails are being sent to our office and personal addresses without our
> consent. I had sent a request to unsubscribe my personal id but the
> moderator has not complied with my request and continues to send emails and
> digests from both humjanenge@googlegroups.com and rti4empowerment group. As
> if such compulsion is not enough we have to suffer emails which use foul
> language targetting everybody. Now the Constitution is being targetted in
> the same manner. Everybody has a right to be critical of other people's
> views, the Constitution and all other laws, but abusive language may be
> avoided. These comments are being made in a public discussion forum without
> realising that other members may feel offended even to receive such mails in
> their Inboxes. Kindly avoid using abusive language to express your views. It
> serves no purpose except showing the sender in poor light.
> Thanks
> Venkatesh Nayak
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:24 PM, <HumJanenge+noreply@googlegroups.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Topic: IMPORTANT SPECIAL NOTICE
>
> ________________________________
> From: humjanenge@googlegroups.com [mailto:humjanenge@googlegroups.com] On
> Behalf Of sroy 1947
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 9:54 PM
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: IMPORTANT SPECIAL NOTICE
>
> Dear Ms Singh
>
> Col Kurup is spot on. You don't need a "Constitutional lawyer" <rol> to
> explain why the ground reality does not map to the Constitution. BTW its
> only the Marxists who stand for the piece of crap that our much amended
> Constitution now is.
>
> PS: Can you inform the Hon'ble members the precise "Constitutional" posts
> that Ms Sonia Gandhi or Rahul Gandhi occupy ???.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Col Kurup,you should consult a Constituitonal lawyer to get the
>> correct picture.
>> Regards
>> Urvi
>>
>>
You left out "1(2) (2) It extends to the whole of India."
The "place" has to be within India. Is Googlegroups a "place" ?
Who has "burnt, mutilated, defaced, defiled, disfigured, destroyed, trampled upon or otherwise brought into contempt" the Constitution of India or the Flag.
In any case our moderator PMK would gladly be a martyr if EQUAL action was taken
against your traitor friends like Arundhati Roy, SRS Geelani etc. for their public comments made in Jammu and Kashmir (is it not a part of India ?) which are much much worse than what PMK has written. They know how to extract every last drop of publicity by claiming to be patriots seeking the AMENDMENT of India's Constitution to give AZAADI to Kashmir, thus taking their offence out of the purview of National Honours Act. They have expert advocates like Prasanth Bhushan, Colin Gonsalves , Maya Daruwala to help them escape punishment by twisting the law and by the help of their friends in NAC who get Home Minister to drop IPC proceedings against them..
You have no right to speak on such matters of patriotism. As employee of UK NGO and getting your salary from Government of UK. before posting such messages to this group have you ever similarly publicly condemned Arundhati Roy or Krishnaraj Rao (who sings national anthem in public chambers of SCIC while court proceeding are in progress)
sd/-
1. Dr Durgesh Nandan Agrawal
2. S.D.Sharma
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:13 AM, venkatesh nayak
<nayak.venkatesh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all, especially Mr. Moderator,
> This is an extract from The Prevention Of Insults To National Honor Act,
> 1971.Act No. 69 Of 1971:
>
>
>
> "2. Insult to Indian National Flag and Constitution of India.
> Whoever in any public place or in any other place within public view burns,
> mutilates, defaces, defiles, disfigures, destroys, tramples upon or
> otherwise brings into contempt (whether by words, either spoken or written,
> or by acts) the Indian National Flag or the
> Constitution of India or any part thereof, shall be punished with
> imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or
> with both.
>
> Explanation 1.-Comments expressing disapprobation or criticism of the
> Constitution or of the Indian National Flag or of any measures of the
> Government with a view to obtain an amendment of the Constitution of India
> or an alteration of the Indian National Flag by lawful means do not
> constitute an offence under this section."
>
> First of many of us did not opt to become members of this new RTI group.
> Mails are being sent to our office and personal addresses without our
> consent. I had sent a request to unsubscribe my personal id but the
> moderator has not complied with my request and continues to send emails and
> digests from both humjanenge@googlegroups.com and rti4empowerment group. As
> if such compulsion is not enough we have to suffer emails which use foul
> language targetting everybody. Now the Constitution is being targetted in
> the same manner. Everybody has a right to be critical of other people's
> views, the Constitution and all other laws, but abusive language may be
> avoided. These comments are being made in a public discussion forum without
> realising that other members may feel offended even to receive such mails in
> their Inboxes. Kindly avoid using abusive language to express your views. It
> serves no purpose except showing the sender in poor light.
> Thanks
> Venkatesh Nayak
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:24 PM, <HumJanenge+noreply@googlegroups.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Topic: IMPORTANT SPECIAL NOTICE
>
> ________________________________
> From: humjanenge@googlegroups.com [mailto:humjanenge@googlegroups.com] On
> Behalf Of sroy 1947
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 9:54 PM
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: IMPORTANT SPECIAL NOTICE
>
> Dear Ms Singh
>
> Col Kurup is spot on. You don't need a "Constitutional lawyer" <rol> to
> explain why the ground reality does not map to the Constitution. BTW its
> only the Marxists who stand for the piece of crap that our much amended
> Constitution now is.
>
> PS: Can you inform the Hon'ble members the precise "Constitutional" posts
> that Ms Sonia Gandhi or Rahul Gandhi occupy ???.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Col Kurup,you should consult a Constituitonal lawyer to get the
>> correct picture.
>> Regards
>> Urvi
>>
>>
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.