Re: [HumJanenge] Fwd: CIC

Despite my repeated requests, u r not unsubscribing me.  No sensible person will issue warning to his members.  He can advise only.  It seems, Mr PMK that arrogant behaviour is in your blood and thy name should be arrogant.

I pity on u.

---

From: vishal kudchadkar <vishal.kudchadkar@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, 14 November, 2010 7:29:52 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Fwd: CIC

Me 2. RTI is so unkoool

On 11/14/10, Metrodesk Ptinews <metro.ptinews@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please unsubscribe me. I don't want to receive emails like this.
>
> Rajesh Kochhar
> PTI
>
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 7:02 PM, bimal khemani
> <bimal.khemani@yahoo.co.in>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Friends
>> I am attaching here with 6 documenmts
>> Smt. Premlata Sharma applied to CPIO, BSNL , Aligarh
>> for inspection of a particular file  ( 01.jpg  )
>> The CPIO did not responded while after First appeal the FAA
>> has sent his reply with a copy of affidavit ( 02.jpg  & 03.jpg )
>> Smt. Premalata filed her 2nd appeal before CIC  ( 04.jpg )
>> The funny order of CIC ( 05.jpg )
>>
>> BSNL , Aligarh is headed by a General Manager with various brances like
>> Commercial, Accounts, Engineering etc. The applicant wanted inspection of
>> a
>> file which is available with the commercial section, . The FAA who is DGM
>> in
>> adminstrative department, without going into the details sent an affidavit
>> signed by his Commercial officer  stating that the file is not available
>> in
>> his branch , the FAA in place of searching file in other departments under
>> his control, choose to take this shortest route.
>> The matter was referred to CIC with a prayer that the authority be
>> directed
>> to give an affidavit recording the reason for the lost of file.
>> The case was fixed for hearing on 12-10-2010, The appealant sent an E.mail
>> as well as FAX to the Asstt. Registrar of CIC on 11-10-2010, which was not
>> put up in the record and in absence of the appellant the appeal was heard.
>> The learned CIC in his decision did not considered the prayer of the
>> appellant and given the decision within the framework of RTI gave his
>> verdict like a High Court judge.
>> I am failed to understand, under RTI how CIC can ask the appelant to
>> approach the public authority for refund of her  money with interest.
>>
>>
>>
>> BIMAL KUMAR KHEMANI,
>> TRAP group of RTI activists
>>  ALIGARH (U.P.)
>>  Mob:09359724625
>> ******************************************
>> Officially Certified A Grade by DoPT
>> *****************************************
>>
>>
>