Re: [HumJanenge] Re: My IAC grievance on selecting RTI Commissioners of Anna Hazare

Dear Prasad

IAC has nothing to do with all this. IAC's name is needlessly being
dragged into this.

AFAIK I have never spoken to Anna, except 2 words in Marathi in 2006
when at CIC Convention
some papers slipped from his grasp and I helped him to pick them up.
So I can't help you on mobile number.

Yes, there is 100% Transparency in IAC - but we shall never be a
public authority - subject only to operational requirements and
exemptions contained in RTI Act.

Sarbajit

On 8/24/13, prasad vaidya <prasadbvaidya@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Respected sir
> you are alway saying that there is 100 percent
> transparency in your organistion will you please provide me shree annaji's
> mobile number I would like like to request Shri. Anaaji on important issues
> prasad vaidya latur mo-8857993253
>
> viadya
> ________________________________
> From: Anna BVA Office <joinbvga@gmail.com>
> To: kvijay14@gmail.com; rti4empowerment <rti4empowerment@googlegroups.com>;
> humjanenge <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, 17 August 2013 11:20 AM
> Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: My IAC grievance on selecting RTI Commissioners of
> Anna Hazare
>
>
> To:
> Shri Vijay Kumbhar
>
> Please refer your below email 16/8/2013 sent from online form at
> http://saverti.webege.com
> with subject "My IAC grievance on selecting RTI Commissioners of Anna
> Hazare"
>
> Base on your below email, copy of which is automatically forward to us
> and preserved, the complaint was lodged in President Helpline with
> your email ID as told in emails sent to all RTI e-groups.
>
> BVA
> Bhrastachar Virodhi Andolan
>
> On 8/16/13, Vijay Kumbhar <kvijay14@gmail.com> wrote:
>> To:
>> 1) Dr. Man Mohan Singh,
>> Prime Minister of India, by
>> Principal Secretary to Prime Minister
>> "oo.prlsecypmo@nic.in"
>> Secretary to Prime Minister
>> "oo.ramanujam@gov.in"
>>
>> 2) Smt. Sushma Swaraj,
>> Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha
>> "sushmaswaraj@hotmail.com, sushma.swaraj@bjp.org"
>>
>> 3) Smt. Sonia Gandhi,
>> Chairperson NAC
>> "chairperson@nac.nic.in, dhiraj.s@nac.nic.in"
>>
>> cc:
>> 4) Mr. Ajit K. Seth,
>> Cabinet Secretary,
>> "cabinetsy@nic.in"
>>
>> 5) Mr. Shymal K. Sarkar,
>> Secretary Dept of Personnel & Training,
>> "secy_mop@nic.in"
>>
>> 6) Mr. Manoj Joshi,
>> Jt. Secretary Dept of Personnel & Training,
>> "jsata@nic.in"
>>
>>
>>
>> Sub: My Public Grievance on appointing Information Commissioners
>>
>> Please find enclosed a copy of my Public Grievance lodged today on the
>> President of India's online facility. I am an aggrieved Right To
>> Information ("RTI") user and subscriber to the popular movement known as
>> "India Against Corruption"
>>
>> Dr. Anna Hazare and India Against Corruption have issued a public Appeal
>> and
>> initially asked Indian citizens not to vote for either the Congress Party
>> or
>> the Bharatiya Janta Party (BJP) unless all the 5 vacant posts of
>> Information
>> Commissioner in the Central Information Commission are selected
>> exclusively
>> from eminent RTI activists and civil society experts who have applied for
>> the post.
>>
>> Their Appeal may be viewed online at Anna's RTI Appeal
>>
>> Dr. Hazare and India Against Corruption have come to know that the Prime
>> Minister (Cong.) and the Leader of Opposition (BJP) have mutually decided
>> that maximum number of retired bureaucrats from among their pre-selected
>> candidates shall be appointed as Information Commissioners. The
>> candidates
>> for the vital post of Chief Information Commissioner have also been
>> corruptly restricted to either Mr.P.K. Misra (former Secretary DoPT) or
>> to
>> the senior-most of the present Information Commissioners (who are also
>> all
>> former bureaucrats) in a thoroughly irregular and unprescribed manner.
>>
>> It would thus seem that the applications which were solicited and
>> inserted
>> in the newspapers and on the DoPT's website are a only device devised to
>> obscure predetermined selections by a process best described as "horse
>> trading". It is certainly strange that all the previous Chief
>> Information Commissioners without exception were formerly Secretaries to
>> the Govt. of India.
>>
>> Dr Anna Hazare and the India Against Corruption stress that sub-section
>> 12(5) of the Right to Information Act specifies that
>> "The Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners
>> shall be persons of eminence in public life with wide knowledge and
>> experience in law, science and technology, social service, management,
>> journalism, mass media or administration and governance."
>>
>>
>> This clause does not specify that only retired bureaucrats shall be
>> appointed to these posts. Neither is it envisaged, either in its letters
>> or
>> in its spirit, that this clause is to serve as the vehicle for retired
>> bureaucrats to retain their luxurious perks of office as sinecures for
>> services they rendered while in office.
>>
>> From the repeated improper practice of appointment of Chief Information
>> Commissioners exclusively from the bureaucracy, a popular perception has
>> now
>> taken strong hold that the Prime Minister and BJP have corruptly decided
>> that Mr. Pradeep Kumar Misra will be appointed as next Chief Information
>> Commissioner and they have taken their corrupt decision without issuing
>> any
>> notice or publicly seeking applications for the post.
>>
>> It seems therefrom the present Government and the Opposition BJP only
>> appoint pliable persons in such sensitive positions who know the tricks
>> by
>> which one ex-government officer will help another government officer to
>> escape from giving information about their parties. A pliable person who
>> will never impose the RTI Act's mandatory penalties on the bureaucracy
>> so that he will get to keep his posh bungalow in Delhi after retirement.
>>
>> The citizens and affected RTI users are concerned that Mr. Pradeep Kumar
>> Misra is such an agreed pliable person and it has been fixed between the
>> Prime Minister Dr. Man Mohan Singh (of the Congress Party) and the Leader
>> of
>> the Opposition in Lok Sabha Smt. Sushma Swaraj (of the Bharatiya Janta
>> Party) that Mr.P.K.Misra and many other such pliable persons will be
>> selected to the Central Information Commission and the legitimate
>> claims/applications of honest and eminent RTI experts and persons from
>> Civil
>> Society shall be corruptly ignored by an unprescribed device of a
>> "Screening Committee" which is packed with similarly pliable
>> persons.
>>
>> Accordingly Dr. Anna Hazare and the India Against Corruption have issued
>> their present appeal, and as an affected user of RTI Act processes I am
>> sufficiently aggrieved by their call, seeing my rights to a fair
>> RTI appellate process being hitherto rendered a nullity by appointment of
>> pliable
>> ex-bureaucrats and former public servants, to protest the selection
>> procedures as
>> ultra-vires and to demand that the appointments be honest, fully
>> transparent
>> and conducted openly.
>>
>> PRAYER: Kindly see to it that in this round of appointments not even 1
>> (one)
>> ex-public servant is selected so as to redress the gross imbalance in
>> backgrounds and experience prevailing in the Central Information
>> Commission,
>> and that all its selections are conducted publicly and transparently.
>>
>> NB: Kindly preserve all correspondence and notings on my instant
>> Grievance
>> as I shall be RTI-ing for it, if required, once the selections are
>> concluded.
>>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.