Thursday, May 9, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] Why is NaMO scared of an independent Lokayukta ?

Dear Sumer Agarwal,

Well said.  You are 100% correct.  People have not voted against corruption in K'tak.  All corrupt people have been elected.   Apart from Vir Bhadra Singh in HP(CBI had a clear case of his involvement in a Scam, but was let off, may be at the instance of Sonia and Co. ),  Lalus in Bihar, Mulayams in UP, Mayavathi in UP, Karunas in TN, Reddys in AP, (even though the latter (s) are not in power now,  but, they prop up the Govt. and rein lot of control over the UPA II with their meniscus strength) in the recently concluded K'tak election, the BS Yeddyurapa's KJP and Reddy Brothers proxy BSR Congress party ( B.S. Sriramulu an associate of the  Reddy Mining Barons of Bellary) and BJP's porn addicted MLAs, totally misruled the State and hence, they had no option except to vote to Congress whose track records are no so  better than the above tainted parties  and such climax scenes  they will start to experience for another 5 years. K'tak electorate know who are corrupt. They should have totally rejected them by losing their deposit, if they had really voted against corruption. But the fact is different. The K'tak election is nothing to cheer that they have voted against corruption. In fact, they have elected  only corrupt MLAs again. All the parties have some share in the land scams (Bangalore-Mysore Industrial Corridor) Iron Ore mining etc., etc. It is all  well known that Deve Gowda and his Son Kumaraswamy are also part of the BSY Scam.  SM Krishna is in possession of huge track of Coffee Estates in Chikmagalur, Hassan, Bhadravathi and he is the Franchiser of Coffee Business which earns him 100s Crores every year.  How it is possible without misappropriating rich forest lands ?  There are so many misdeeds each and every Politicians are indulging.  Some  are exposed and some (most)  of them covered up when  they surface here and there and most of Scams don't see the light of the day by connivance of Officials and Politicians. .  Take the case of land grab/scams in Maharashtra. Two years back, after the Adharsh Scam came to light through a Whistle Blower  and  land scams and irrigation scams exposed. by CAG Reports,  What happened ? All are covered up by Sharad Pawer the most corrupt Politician in the country  as he has close links with all these scams.  Apart from these, Scams in the  Food and Agriculture Ministry  on import and export of food grains for which he was the Central Cabinet Minister.  After the Scams surfaced, he clearly divested some portfolios.  By divesting portfolios, can be devoid of these Scams. As per CAG Reports, 1000s of Crores loss to the Exchequer due to import and export of food grains. What action was initiated against him. ?  Nothing so far  He is the King Maker in the UPA II. He hand picks  the CM of M'stra who will be a puppet and amenable to all his misdeeds.  That much control he reins at M'stra.  As Food and Agriculture Minister of the Country, his only concern is how to protect the Sugar Cane Farmers and Sugar Barons at M'stra.( In UP the Sugar Barons are controlled by Mulayam and Co.)  I have not  seen any report of Sharad Pawar  involvement in inter linking of Rivers, reclaiming barren lands, generating irrigation facilities, reduce import of food grains and export of surplus food grains, etc., etc.,  Inter linking of Rivers will accrue   enormous wealth to the Nations's Exchequer  and reduce poverty.  I have not at all  seen his involvement in any of these most important development  priorities in the country, but his only  concern is lobbying for Sugar barons and to become PM.  Already the country is suffering with MMS as PM and added to it, Sharad Pawar also wants to grab more power at Centre.  

The way the Ccoalgate Scam is handled by CBI, it is a open secret now, how the Sonia and Co. would have manipulated the 2 G Scam in the CBI Report to ensure that her involvement, MMS, PC, Pranab, names are not figuring and fix only A.Raja.  How, a single Minister can  indulge such a big Scam without the knowledge of Cabinet and PMO.   Then what for a Cabinet if such an important far reaching policy matters are not discussed in the Cabinet ?  The total functioning of Govt. is farce.  Only a revolution elsewhere happening in the world, will oust all the corrupt Politicians. 

SO, IT IS TOTALLY WRONG TO SAY THAT K'TAK ELECTORATE HAD  REJECTED THE CORRUPT.  IT IS ONLY AN ILLUSION. IN FACT, K'TAK ELECTED VOTED ONLY FOR CORRUPT POLITICIANS. 

UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, IAC SHOULD DECIDE HOW TO GO ABOUT TO ROOT OUT CORRUPTION  IN SUCH A SITUATION WHEN THE ELECTORATE ITSELF VOTE FOR CORRUPT.   

With Best Regards,
A.S.KALYANAM

--- On Thu, 9/5/13, Sumer Agarwal <sumeragarwal@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Sumer Agarwal <sumeragarwal@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why is NaMO scared of an independent Lokayukta ?
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Date: Thursday, 9 May, 2013, 8:37 PM

Has the public ever voted against corruption. If they did Vir Bhadra Singh who had to resign from Centre won in Himachal.Congress  ministers are facing corruption charges at the centre and getting support of regional parties through CBI.If the CBI becomes independent and pursues cases fairly and without prejudice, then people like Lalu will be behind bars and not supporting the Congress party.

On Thursday, May 9, 2013, neelu singh wrote:
Dear Vidyut,

You need not worry what NaMo does. Any sensible person will understand what Congress does to the nation and has been doing to nation since pre/post independence.
My advise, better to keep quiet or quit India(all the treacherous people of Congress and for God sake save India).

Don't try to influence the people with false propaganda.

Srikanth

--- On Tue, 2/4/13, Vidyut Kale <wide.aware@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Vidyut Kale <wide.aware@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why is NaMO scared of an independent Lokayukta ?
To: devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com
Cc: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Date: Tuesday, 2 April, 2013, 9:46 PM

I don't think he has a choice. There are several concerning exposes on corruption already. The CAG report was scathing about the ill management of loans. A Lokayukta in itself is not a problem, but if you have issues which are too large to PR away or have no sane defense?


On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:31 PM, <devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com> wrote:
I think Narendra Modi will live to regret the day he passes his proposed Lokayukata bill. This was one opportunity for him to show his credentials for honesty and fairness. He has not only lost a golden opportunity but he will virtually destroy his party's  anti-corruption campaign.  Devinder  

From: Sainik Sangh <gs@sainiksangh.org>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Tuesday, 2 April 2013, 15:31
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] Why is NaMO scared of an independent Lokayukta ?

Bad indicator
 
From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net [mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of Sarbajit Roy
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 7:49 PM
To: indiaresists
Subject: [IAC#RG] Why is NaMO scared of an independent Lokayukta ?
 

Narendra Modi govt gets bill that dilutes powers of Lokayukta passed

Edited by Abhinav Bhatt | Updated: April 02, 2013 18:54 IST
The Gujarat Assembly today passed a bill introduced by the Narendra Modi government that attempts to overhaul the process of appointing the Lokayukta, virtually giving the full control to the state. As the government pushed through the bill, the opposition, Congress, staged a walkout.

According to the bill, the Lokayukta will have to seek the government's permission before acting on a complaint. Also, the Lokayukta's report will not be binding on the state government.

If a complaint is found to be frivolous, the complainant will have to deposit Rs. 2000 to Rs. 25,000 as fine and may serve six months in jail, according to the bill.

It also says that the selection panel for the Lokayukta would include the chief minister, the assembly speaker, a minister and the leader of the opposition; thus, eliminating the role of the Governor and Chief justice of the Gujarat High Court from the appointment process.

Arjun Modhwadia, president of the Gujarat Congress says, "The government wants to create a model, which aims at promoting corruption. It doesn't want any interference from the Supreme Court or High Court."

Mr Modi has been at loggerheads with Gujarat Governor Kamala Beniwal over the appointment of Justice RA Mehta as the Gujarat Lokayuta in August 2011. Mr Modi's government had challenged Justice Mehta's appointment in the Gujarat High Court, terming it illegal and accusing the Governor of not consulting the government.

In January 2012, the Gujarat High Court upheld the Lokayukta's appointment and slammed Mr Modi, saying, "The Chief Minister acted under a false impression that he could turn down the superiority and primacy of the opinion of the Chief Justice, which was binding. The spiteful and challenging action demonstrates the false sense of invincibility."

Mr Modi's government had challenged the order in the Supreme Court, which too upheld the verdict, saying Justice Mehta's appointment was legal.

WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Vidyut
Twitter: @Vidyut
Phone: Allergic
Telephone: Forget it.
Mobile phone: Forgot

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----



--
Thanks and warm regards.
Er Sumer Agarwal
BE Mech(IIT-Roorkee) MS Indus(University of Michigan,USA)
Former Teaching Fellow, University of Michigan- Administration,Human  Performance
Former Research Assistant, University of Michigan- Management Information Systems
Former International Scholar, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, Ann Arbor, USA
Roorkee University (IIT ROORKEE) Member,University Students Council,Bhawan Council,Dy Bhawan Leader,Prefect
 
"CURSE NOT DARKNESS, LIGHT A LAMP"
"VEGETARIAN IS HEALTHY"


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.