Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Re: [HumJanenge] Seeking Advice

To the extent that the judgment at Para 21 says that information must
be provided under RTI process in addition to a public authorities own
processes I see no dispute. In the Delhi Highg Court case however, the
PA took the (quite bizarre) stand that since the information already
stood placed in public domain by virtue of the Company Act's
preexisting disclosure provisions, the PA could not be said to either
hold or control the information - hence such info could not be
disclosed under RTI as it is not included in defn of "information".

Sarbajit

Sandeep gupta wrote:
> Please find enclosed a judgement of kerala high court (para 21). as i
> understand from plain reading of this judgement, any route can be used
> for seeking information. As I may not be sound enough to interpret,
> Sarbajit sir may please go through the same and comment.
> regards
> sandeep
>
> On 8/22/12, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Applicant wants certified copy of order of Delhi High Court. The
> > orders of CIC (our old friend) allowing dual route have all been
> > stayed. so Judicial records are to be applied for under High Court
> > Rules (not RTI) as these Rules are (allegedly) framed under
> > CONSTITUTIONAL powers of High Courts which over-ride that of a mere
> > Parliamentary legislation like RTI Act 2005.So follow advice of mr V.
> > Bansal
> >
> > Sandeep gupta wrote:
> >> even kerala high court has held like that. i will send the order soon.
> >>
> >> On 8/22/12, capt beniwal <trident142@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> >> > I understand CIC has held that the applicant take a route, either under
> >> > RTI
> >> > or the court rules, he likes to obtain the information. rgds. beniwal
> >> >
> >> > --- On Tue, 21/8/12, vinod.virgo@gmail.com <vinod.virgo@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > From: vinod.virgo@gmail.com <vinod.virgo@gmail.com>
> >> > Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Seeking Advice
> >> > To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> >> > Date: Tuesday, 21 August, 2012, 4:03 PM
> >> >
> >> > विनोद बंसल जी, विनोद पांड्या जी, एम.के.गुप्ता जी और सुरेंद्र जी, आप सभी
> >> > का
> >> > हार्दिक धन्यवाद। विनोद पांड्या जी, ज़रूरत पड़ी तो आपको फ़ोन पर डिस्टर्ब
> >> > करूंगा।
> >> >
> >> > विनोद अग्रहरि
> >> >
> >> > 2012/8/21 Vinod Pandya <vinod_pandya20@yahoo.co.in>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ji apko kort rajisrar ko arji karni hogi aur niklva sakte hai.agar apko
> >> > sp.c.a no. yad hai to net par se bhi le sakte hai.vinod pandya Vinod
> >> > Pandya
> >> >
> >> > 9825551238
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: "vinod.virgo@gmail.com" <vinod.virgo@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> >> > Sent: Monday, 20 August 2012 4:14 PM
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Subject: [HumJanenge] Seeking Advice
> >> >
> >> > आदरणीय साथियो,
> >> > - क्या कोर्ट के किसी
> >> > आदेश की प्रति आरटीआई से निकलवाई जा सकती है?- मुझे दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट के
> >> > एक
> >> > आदेश की सर्टिफाइड कॉपी निकलवानी है।- यह आदेश 1 मई 2012 को जारी हुआ था।
> >> > - यदि आदेश की प्रति निकलवाई जा सकती है, तो आरटीआई आवेदन किसे लिखना होगा
> >> > और
> >> > कहां भेजना होगा?
> >> > कृपया मार्गदर्शन करें।
> >> > ईद की शुभकामनाओं के साथविनोद अग्रहरि
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > वैशाली, ग़ाज़ियाबाद
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
> >> 1722, Sector 14, Hisar-125001, INDIA
> >> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>
>
> --
> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
> 1722, Sector 14, Hisar-125001, INDIA
> Phone: 91-99929-31181

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.