Re: [HumJanenge] notice issued on section 6(3)

Do you have the Book let Can we have Scanned copies of the same N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004. --- On Sun, 19/8/12, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] notice issued on section 6(3) To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Sunday, 19 August, 2012, 7:46 PM As per guidelines issued by DoPT in a booklet, the RTI application should be transferred to the concerned PIO, wherein more than one PIO exist and this should be done either on the same day of next day. PIO should not wait for 5 days. This has been mentioned either in the booklet for applicants or for PIOs which I read two years ago.  From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Sent: Sunday, 19 August 2012 9:38 AM Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] notice issued on section 6(3) Since yr advocate is Mr. S.Goyal, could you please share a copy of your WP. On 8/19/12, Sandeep gupta <drsandgupta@gmail.com> wrote: > I had challenged the definition of section 6(3) made by personnel > department based on which SIC punjab ordered that transfer to only one > public authority can be made under section 6(3). The high court after > hearing the arguments has issued notice to State of Punjab, Ministry > of Personnel and Training and to the SIC Punjab. the next hearing is > on October 15 2012. the case number is cwp 15719 of 2012 > The following grounds have been made: > general clauses act > power of ministry of personnel and training > section 30 of the rti act > > -- > Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta > 1722, Sector 14, Hisar-125001, INDIA > Phone: 91-99929-31181 >