This can be argued the other way.
1) A widely decentralised PA can decide to have only a single
Centralised PIO (with an alternate for, say, when he is on leave) .
2) This PIO can then seek assistance of any other officer u/s 5(4)/
(5).
PAs which are implementing this model are very efficient. The reason
why it is so effective is that that A) the PIO is a master in denying
information using the RTI Act B) If any information to be disclosed is
hidden by any other officer - then the PIO will fully press for
penalty against that officer and will not shield him (to save
himself).
Sarbajit
On Aug 19, 11:52 pm, Vikram Simha <vikramsimh...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> When did you create a new post of Chief Public Information Officer .
> Way Back in 2006 itself when Canrabank HQ Bangalore created such a Post and while arguing Before Smt Padma balasubramanum Former IC Camp Bangalore in S A hafeez Vs CanaraBank , I Brought this To Her Notice and she Furious Enough To call a Lady Who was Designnated Cheif PIO of Canrabank and Directed Her to approach Cnrarabank board
> to immediatly Cancel the Circular of that appoint ment and Finally even threatened to contact Finance minister Mr Chidambarum
> Afterwards there was No Mention of Chief PIO in Canra bank Website
> You can also see Central information Commission Case of AtulJain Vs Canrabank ..... CIC/SM/A/2009/001155 &1160 of 22/06/2010
> For More Brevity I reproduce
> "....... we find the practice of the Bank in getting every reply of CPIO (meaning Central PIO) vetted by the Head office before it is issued to the applicant a very cumbersome procedure with the spread of the offices of the Bank all over India requiring CPIOs to get back to the HO in Bangalore in every RTI case is entierly avoidable as the present system is fraught with possibility of delays ..... Decentrlise without Mandatory reference to HO in every case
> I was Representing in Both cases as i am an former Officer of CanaraBANK
> Nobody can be appointed Chief PIO .
> you have got yourself confused as the ACt or Rule Does not pernit Creation of such a post Nor Vetting down by Higherups
> Advises should be Based on the Law , practicle and Pragmatic and not based on individiual Interpretations which tend to be Erroneous
> DEAR MODERATORS: Kind Request Please Block such posts leading to Utter confusions
> N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004.
>
> --- On Fri, 17/8/12, Hari Goyal <haridgo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Hari Goyal <haridgo...@hotmail.com>
> Subject: RE: [HumJanenge] Multiple Subjects /Multiple PIOs / Single address?
> To: "humjanenge geoglegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Cc: "rti dwarka" <rtidwa...@yahoo.co.in>
> Date: Friday, 17 August, 2012, 12:09 PM
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> You can apply to one Chief Public information Officer (CPIO) of the Public Authority with Rs. 10/-
> as RTI application fee.
>
> But you are to add one sentence before mentioning about rti fee;
> "that is u/s 6(3) of the RTI Act, in case the information sought or part of it is with some
> other dection/department of the Public Authority, that part may be transferred to them
> under intimation to the applicant".
>
> Hari Goyal
> rtidwa...@yahoo.co.in
>
>
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:50:43 +0530
> Subject: [HumJanenge] Multiple Subjects /Multiple PIOs / Single address?
> From: hemantkshirsaga...@gmail.com
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com; sroy...@gmail.com
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am applying for an RTI application where the organization has several CPIOs as per the subjects/department, and they have requested for the separation of the requests as their internal departments, the question is :-
>
> 1) Can I apply in the same envelope both the applications?
> 2) Can I apply for the same in the same single 10 Rs postal order?
>
> Looking eagerly for your reply!!
>
> Regards,
> Hemant
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.