Mr.Hari Goyal,
Following are the clarifications sought by you on Kerala Lok Ayukta:
1. I suggest that you go through the Kerala Lok Ayukta Act. It is
available in the web
2. The Act has not given any such clause. In his capacity as Lok
Ayukta he can seek any answer to his querries even from CM's Office.
3. Question is not clear
4, Any cityzen of India can seek information from the Lok Ayukta
under RTI Act. MMyself in person had sought such information and
received
5. Not understood
On 04/01/2011, Hari Goyal <
haridgoyal@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Major Ravi and RTI Activists,
>
> Wish you all a Very Very Happy, Healthy, Peaceful, Bright and prosperous NEW
> YEAR 2011.
>
> 1. What are the powers and Functions of a State Lokayukata?
>
> 2. Can he seek information from the Chief Minister (CM) of the State?
>
> 3. As per my knowledge, favourites of the CM are se3lecte3d for thiws
> post.
>
> 4. Can any RTI activist seek information under RTI Act, 2005 from
> Lokayukata?
>
> 5. When an officer of the State Government under CM says, if you want
> Fundamental Right of EQUALITY before Law and Equal Protection of Law
> under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, you go to the HIGH COURT
> or Supreme Court of India. Since I have been given
> quasi-judicial functions under the Cooperative Societies Act. You
> cannot demand even NATURAL JUSTICE from me. You will have to go the HC or
> SC.for that.
>
> Shall appreciate an early response,
>
> Regards N bw
>
> Hari Goyal
> Director,Right to Information- Centre
>
rtidwarka@yahoo.co.in>
rtidwarka@yahoo.co.in>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:08:31 +0530
> From:
mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI to Bank
> To:
humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
>
>
>
>
> I fail to understand why the private sector banks are out of RTI ambit while
> they have been estabilished after getting permission from the Govt.and
> working under the government (RBI) norms.The same can be said about discoms
> viz BSES and Rajdhani Power Ltd in Delhi.
>
> --- On Mon, 3/1/11, Ravindran P M <
pmravindran@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Ravindran P M <
pmravindran@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI to Bank
> To:
humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Monday, 3 January, 2011, 8:22 AM
>
>
>
> Thats a good advice, Adv Charly.
>
> Incidently while both public sector banks and pvt sector banks do the same
> businessti dicriminatory for one set of banks to be subject to rti act while
> the others are not? In any case NO bank would give third party info to
> anybody except states' investigating agencies.
>
> regards n bw
>
> ravi
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:31 PM, <
md@newlifemfi.org> wrote:
>
> There is no provision in banking regulation act to provide loan to customer
> for offering dowry since it is against public policy .0n this grounds the
> case sd be conduted Adv Charly
> Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
>
>
>
> From: Victor <
satyagrahi3@gmail.com>
> Sender:
humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:09:51 +0530
> To: <
humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
> ReplyTo:
humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
>
>
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI to Bank
>
> Here is more background on this:
>
> My wife has filed Dowry harrassment charges. She alleges that her father got
> a loan from ICICI Bank, putting his home as collateral for dowry. I am
> seeking information from ICICI Bank in this regard to support my case and
> get justice. The police isn't taking the pain to enquire the same. If I can
> somehow get this information before the case goes to court, the police would
> be duty bound to not file a blind chargesheet based on allegations, rather
> do further investigations properly and give us a clean chit.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 8:54 PM, raja bunch <
bunch_raja@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Mr Anurag
> I request U to put some more details of the matter in
> question. People will understand better in case there is some feasibility in
> using RTI for a larger cause.
> Rgds
> Bunch
>
>
> --- On Sat, 1/1/11, Sarbajit Roy <
sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Sarbajit Roy <
sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI to Bank
> To:
humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Saturday, 1 January, 2011, 8:22 PM
>
>
>
>
>
> Re, the 2 previous posts
>
> 1) ACF_ANAND: should it be "hence you CANNOT directly seek the information
> from them" ?
>
> 2) R.K.Mukherjee: Most of the advise you have given is completely off the
> mark. The question is who HOLDS the info Mr Victor seeks. If it is ICICI
> Bank only, then chances are bleak using RTI. If it concerns his own
> grievance, he can use the RBI's mandated grievance (3 layer) redressal
> scheme which terminates in the Ombudsman,
>
> Sarbajit
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Anand acf <
acfanand@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ICICI Bank is a private bank. Hecne You can seek directly information
> from them. But if govt bodies such as RBI if has any acess to these
> information, then you can acess those information through the same
> public authority.
>
>
>
>
> On 1/1/11, Victor <
satyagrahi3@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is it possible to get information regarding a loan from ICICI Bank using
>> RTI? This information is needed for a legal matter and would help the
>> investigation. I had filed the RTI with ICICI Bank, but I think since
>> private banks don't fall under this ambit they didn't reply (even though
>> this information was regarding a legal matter and case details and copy
>> was
>> shared with them). Will filing the RTI with RBI help? Could it possibly
>> direct ICICI Bank to share the information requested?
>>
>> Any help, or suggestions would be highly appreciated.
>>
>> Anurag
>>
>
>
> --
> Anand S.
> Coordinator, Anti Corruption Forum
> Bangalore 560 085.
> Cell No. +91-92410-12730
>
>
>
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.