Dear Mr Abrol
Please see the attached documents.
regards n bw
ravi
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Rakshpal Abrol <rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
TheJudges have been given the discretionary power as given to President of India, Prime Minister of India , Chief Ministers,Ministers, Commissioners of Income Tax, Commissioner of Excise Duties, Commissioner of Customs, Salt Commissioner,Police Officers, Police Inspectors, Public Prosecutors etcOnce a Judge is appointed can not be removed.I have faced the problem of carrying goods in my Motor Vehicle in the year 1985 on 3rd January,1985 at Mumbai. That time Motor VehicleAct,1939 was in force. Under Section 42(1) the carrying the goods in any Motor Vehicle was allowed to carry up to 4000 kilogram in Light Motor Vehuiclefor demionstration, sale & Purchase ,but without any reward .I had contested the case without the assistant of any Court Officere (Advocate) and was able get the order in 6 months.After the Commemcement of Motor Vehicle Act,1888, again I had faced the similar issue.I contested the matter.This time I took the assistant of Court Officer(Advocate). I was able to get the order after three years.I contested one more issue in the year 1992. I contested the matter all alone without the assistant of the Court Officer (Advocate).I receivedthe order in Five Years in my favour.I was arrested on 31st July1994 on flimsy ground without any authority of law prevailing in the country.I took the assistant of Court Officer (Advocate)It took more than 18 years and I had been convicted 13 months.I had to challange at Session Court as they Lower Court was not having proof of arrest under the legal provision of the prevailing law in force.
Warm regards,
From: Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri, 7 January, 2011 11:11:04 PM
Subject: Re: 04 - RE: [HumJanenge] public prosecutor, magistrate, high court judges, supreme court judges
Even if you narrate the process/ behavioral aspect of a Judge during the case in ur petition or submission a contermpt will be raised.
This is my personal observation. To lie down the person to process any further. Not only this but but also many times bad remarks are passed . I had once observed that petition was on board. Without serving any notice to other party my case was dismissed . When I saw the Judgment it was containing 4 pages. In another case it was dismissed and Judgment pages were 4 pages and irrelevant to the case!!!!
Even one PIL was dismissed. But the other Judge Issued order to DCP Traffic to give an affidavit to my petition. Other Judge without taking on record Affidavit in reply " Dismissed" and judgment was containing some clarification by Chief Justice at his own !!!!!
This case was for Public Interest at large for towing the vehicles by Police. This is totally illegal under the Motor Vehicle Act. You go through the Provisions under Motor Vehicle Act . Such behavioral is against Public at large.!!!!!!???
God save us.
Shah D J
--- On Fri, 7/1/11, shak her <shake_lak2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: shak her <shake_lak2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: 04 - RE: [HumJanenge] public prosecutor, magistrate, high court judges, supreme court judges
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Friday, 7 January, 2011, 6:44 AM
From: Justice Kamleshwar Nath <justicekn@gmail.com>
Subject: 04 - RE: [HumJanenge] public prosecutor, magistrate, high court judges, supreme court judges
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Thursday, 6 January, 2011, 2:25 PM
ADVISORY: There is currently a display bug in Yahoo! Mail that effects forwarded messages, causing such messages to be improperly displayed. Yahoo! is working on a fix. In the mean time, you can switch to Yahoo! Mail Classic (see "Options" menu at top right, choose "Mail Clasic...") to see these messages properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.Waitlist reason: humjanenge@googlegroups.com is not on your Guest List | Approve sender | Approve domain |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.