Re: [IAC#RG] DOES VERDICT AGAINST JAYALALITHA SIGNIFY ANYTHING ?

Dear Sureshan

The ITAT had already overturned this matter, the DB (ie A.Sikri and
Kait) agreed with the ITAT as follows:

"The assessee has fully discharged her legal obligations by disclosing
the identity of all the donors. Further, donors have proved their
genuineness and capacity to make a gift. All assessee as well as the
donors had appeared before the Registrar and the gifts are duly
registered. All gifts are absolute and without any lien of anyone.
There is no evidence on record to prove that the assessee has favoured
the donor in any manner whatsoever by acquiring the gifts in question.
The capacity of any person does not mean how much they earn monthly or
annually, but the term capacity has vided term and that can be
perceived by how wealthy he is. All the formalities, as per law are
met by the assessee and donors as well. All the donors have admitted
that they are great admirer of the assessee as she is working for the
upliftment of poor people. "

Let us see what the courts now say on Ramdev's disproportionate assets.
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-03-13/news/37684038_1_income-tax-divya-yog-mandir-trust-ramdev
http://www.sabhlokcity.com/2014/03/swami-ramdev-subrata-roys-is-a-major-case-of-black-money-do-you-still-support-him/

Sarbajit

On 9/30/14, SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1613352/
>
> see the above link , this is the judgment on an identical disproportionate
> assets issue concerning about Smt Mayavati , The Judgment is written by
> well Known Judge Justice Suresh Kait,,,
>
> Here the court dismissed the allegations against mayavati saying that all
> the assets acquired By Mayavati are gifted by general public , gift
> includes landed property and money. Many of them gifted their nearly half
> of their assets still court believes it as true and correct ...
>
>
> regards
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Jaya Vindhyala <jaya12265@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear sir,
>> certainly we welcome the judgement, but, at the same time we should
>> observe circumstances and judiciary accountability, because judiciary
>> losing independent attitude, politicians interference is strong,
>> judiciary
>> judgments also reflections on ground level parties are working as a
>> backbone. so on this ground we may observe and study the same. otherwise
>> we
>> may run in the flow emotions..jaya vindhyala
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:32 PM, MRCI - Ramesh Patil <mrciin@yahoo.co.in>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> [image: Boxbe] <https://www.boxbe.com/overview> MRCI - Ramesh Patil (
>>> mrciin@yahoo.co.in) is not on your Guest List
>>> <https://www.boxbe.com/approved-list?tc_serial=18749957934&tc_rand=1804793944&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_MWTP&utm_content=001&token=nKtGyX15%2FVlz5m%2FpKhs88FOx%2Bf6%2F7De1sDf1wYHEgi2XGdGwirZZF0VztEfKD1pB&key=8o%2BvzCQNCCegsJC8VnOQNyXl45qHVd7WpTA%2BOTYvmgo%3D>
>>> | Approve sender
>>> <https://www.boxbe.com/anno?tc_serial=18749957934&tc_rand=1804793944&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_MWTP&utm_content=001&token=nKtGyX15%2FVlz5m%2FpKhs88FOx%2Bf6%2F7De1sDf1wYHEgi2XGdGwirZZF0VztEfKD1pB&key=8o%2BvzCQNCCegsJC8VnOQNyXl45qHVd7WpTA%2BOTYvmgo%3D>
>>> | Approve domain
>>> <https://www.boxbe.com/anno?tc_serial=18749957934&tc_rand=1804793944&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_MWTP&utm_content=001&dom&token=nKtGyX15%2FVlz5m%2FpKhs88FOx%2Bf6%2F7De1sDf1wYHEgi2XGdGwirZZF0VztEfKD1pB&key=8o%2BvzCQNCCegsJC8VnOQNyXl45qHVd7WpTA%2BOTYvmgo%3D>
>>>
>>> I agree Joy-Lalitha 's case is like one sollow does not make
>>> summer.Entire system needs to be cleaned.No where Modi talks about
>>> Corruption-he is obsessed with cleanliness and sanitation-He knows it
>>> would
>>> be sheer waste of time and energy in even addressing the
>>> Corruption-When
>>> ex Cm Yedurappa was put behind bars for 9 months -was elevated to VP -In
>>> other words if you can not resist Enjoy
>>>
>>>
>>> RAMESH PATIL
>>>
>>>
>>> MRCI
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, 28 September 2014 10:42 AM, Venkatraman Ns <
>>> nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *To*
>>>
>>> *India Against
>>> Corruption
>>> *
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *DOES VERDICT AGAINST
>>> JAYALALITHA SIGNIFY ANYTHING ?*
>>>
>>>
>>> *The court verdict punishing Ms. Jayalalitha in the corruption case
>>> certainly is a step forward in the anti corruption movement in India.
>>> However, this verdict does not by itself should give any big hope , as
>>> the
>>> verdict has come after nearly eighteen years of trial.*
>>>
>>> *Thousands of corrupt persons in various walks of life including
>>> politicians, bureaucrats, educationists and even so called religious
>>> leaders are now going scot free, as the process of judiciary takes very
>>> long time and many of them do not receive the much deserved punishment
>>> in
>>> their life time. Further, the suspicions about judiciary itself is a
>>> big
>>> deterrent for the anti corruption movement in India. *
>>>
>>> *In the present circumstances, one cannot expect much from the
>>> politicians in power and judiciary to improve the judicial system and
>>> ensure speedy justice. *
>>>
>>> *Huge pressure has to be applied not only on the government but also on
>>> judiciary to ensure delivery of speedy justice , so that fear of
>>> punishment
>>> would deter the persons from indulging in corruption and nepotism.*
>>>
>>> *With the media also increasingly going under the control of business
>>> houses, the anti corruption movement in India has to increasingly depend
>>> upon social media to spread the voice of wisdom. *
>>>
>>> * In such conditions , the movement like India Against Corruption has
>>> huge responsibility and it should play a very strong proactive role.
>>> Increasing participation of concerned persons in expressing their
>>> protests
>>> and voice through such movement is also vitally important to build a
>>> climate of anti corruption in India.*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>>
>>>
>>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://freedomteam.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ftilogo-new-300x183.jpg
> P. Sureshan,
> Advocate-on-record, Supreme Court Of India,
> NLC( India ) Law Office
> No. 90, Second Floor , Bank Enclave , Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92..... Ph:
> 9818083219,8802797432,01132081075
>