Re: [IAC#RG] Appeal to Shanti Bhushan ji

Dear Sureshan

Please stick to the facts

1) Your party's "senior leader" and an employee of a foreign
government came to India in 2012 and was arrested and had a very
serious FIR for rioting and assaulting police officer(s) filed against
him.

2) That, despite being Treasurer, you are reluctant to disclose if
this accused is a paid up member of your party or not, but you still
persist in defending him and projecting him as a senior leader. That
is your prerogative.

3) That this foreigner openly called HMJ. Kait as a "idiot", "petty
fool" etc on his blog. As an officer of the court and office bearer of
the party did you advise your senior leader against it in the same way
you are advising me ?

4) Before lecturing me on defamation, please see the very first line
of that blog post, which you deliberately suppressed (it was clear
therefrom we are exercising our inalienable right to free speech ..
and since I count at least 800 AAP members on our mailing list -each
of whom can post like you are posting).

"Dear IAC subscribers (especially those in Delhi)
Here are some statements, please discuss them
1) The vast majority of Delhi-ites are fed up with Congress and
Congress corruption. ..."

5) The dictionary definition of "rascal"is "a mischievous or cheeky
person, especially a child or man (typically used in an affectionate
way).". The dictionary definition of scoundrel is "a dishonest or
unscrupulous person;" (although I used the word "rogue"). S.499 has
several relevant exemptions which uphold the principle of free speech
and expression which is necessary for a democracy to survive. If you
want to discuss all those clauses in the blogpost - clause wise, which
blogpost I am not retracting or apologising for, you are more than
welcome to do so - publicly on this forum or privately in a court of
law or magistrate.

6) On the issue of Mr. Prashant Bhushan, it is his personal choice to
contest elections, possibly considering his publicly stated views on
the territorial integrity of India. I applaud his decision not to
stand for election if that would have meant swearing a false
affidavit.Your party can learn a lot from him, as SBP people knowingly
gave false affidavits to uphold socialism (your senior leader's
duplicitous comments on this point are littered all over the
internet).

Tea is fine.

Sarbajit


On 9/30/14, SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Sarbajit
>
> Your assertions about Sanjeev is not only baseless but based upon your own
> imagination.
> Entire allegations can be disproved by getting sanjeev's assets details,
> which is not kept in secret, if single penny you found more than declared
> by him you can get it confiscated, not through week Indian Law but through
> strong and efficient Australian Law.
>
> We are committed to truth and transparency, If any body or group try to
> make wild allegations without any basis we will object to it, We will
> conduct due diligence exercise before inducting any person to our party and
> group, that is why Somnath Bharati and Munish raizada forced to leave our
> group and many aspirants are still kept out of our party. Not only sanjeev
> this is applicable to each and every member.
> If you can prove any allegations against sanjeev with sufficient materials
> you are most welcome to do so.
>
> You can get details about sanjeev's resignation from the Ministry of
> personal affairs and training , get it and put it in this forum and show
> that your allegations are true and correct. Other wise you have to withdraw
> your allegations.
>
> I have seen many top level leaders, politicians, spiritual leaders,
> officers , journalists, and professionals and worked very closely with
> them. I never found a person with high moral integrity like Sanjeev
> Sabholk. Yes He is not as perfect as I expect but still he is far far
> better than many so called icons and stars.
>
> Remember calling a person a fool or moron is a personal opinion , which
> required no proof and thus not defamatory , But rascals and scoundrel is
> highly defamatory and objectionable
>
> I am now running out of time , I will have a cup off tea with you later,,
>
> regards
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Sureshan,
>>
>> All your questions are irrelevant.
>>
>> 1) You concede surely that Sanjeev Sabhlok left the IAS under cloudy
>> circumstances and then emigrated to Australia and works for the Govt
>> there. Almost like Philby and Maclean.
>>
>> 2) From Australia Mr. Sabhlok launched a campaign of vicious cyber
>> abuse on many eminent Indians, so long as UPA Govt was in power and
>> was protecting him. Now he is having to delete all his abuses because
>> the legal machinery is working against him. He did all this of course
>> as a paid foreign agent working for a foreign govt inimical to India's
>> economic interests.
>>
>> 3) In 2012 Sabhlok allegedly came to India at the direction of his
>> foreign masters to wage war against the Indian State and spread
>> disaffection against the people. The charges against him were
>> extremely serious ones under IPC. Is it a false statement to say that
>> Sabhlok is an accused in FIR No. 183/2012 in PS:Parliament St. charged
>> u/s 186, 353, 147, 148, 149, 34 IPC, ie. rioting, conspiracy and
>> criminally assaulting police officer with deadly weapon(s) ?
>>
>> 4) It is therefore quite strange that you have allowed this foreign
>> agent provocateur to draft your party's Constitution and insert an
>> absurd clause for foreigners to become Honorary Members and stand for
>> party elections and be elected to National Executive etc. and thus be
>> able to self describe themselves as "senior leaders". Such tomfoolery
>> betrays that your party is not at all serious. In fact I find the
>> Constitution of Swarna Bharat Party to be as poorly written as
>> Sabhlok's rotten book (even Kejriwal's execrable book 'Swaraj' makes
>> for better reading and contains more sense).
>>
>> 5) May I ask if Sanjeev Sabhlok has paid his party membership fee, or
>> was the fee waived for "life" only to induct a bunch of foreigners as
>> "Honorary" life-time members who would run Swarna Bharat Party as an
>> NRI party by remote control from Australia, London and Nigeria,
>> without being subject to Indian Tax questions, or to emulate Sabhlok's
>> ex-IAS colleagues who took no money from NAC but were well paid for
>> passing on the secrets which passed through their hands ? I dare say
>> that Sonia, Rahul, Priyanka and Roberto will also be "senior leaders"
>> of SBP once they are exiled from India.
>>
>> 6) No matter what you say, at IAC we are now genetically and
>> memetically programmed to distrust foreigners and their "lackeys".
>>
>> 7) There is no disconnect in IAC over Sabhlok or Kejriwal. We believe
>> that all foreigners or foreign financed Indians should have no say /
>> role in Indian politics. we encourage all our friends in active politics
>> to remove such person from their parties
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>> On 9/29/14, SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I have specif and clear answer to every issue,
>> >
>> > Before that some simple question Sarbajeet
>> > 1) As per your understanding how much amount is required to start a
>> > political party.
>> > 2) Are you aware about the source of income spent for the SBP
>> registration
>> > If not , it will be available in FTI forum along with fund raising
>> appeals
>> > and donors details go through it and after tell me from which foreign
>> > source we got money.?
>> > Now December 2012, it was not Sanjeev many Delhities who wants to see
>> rule
>> > of law prevailed in country, sat on Dharna and no body instigated any
>> riot
>> > as no riot as alleged happened , even that Police constable died on
>> > heart
>> > attack and not due to any riot, So don't make incorrect and false
>> > statements.
>> > You have disconnected with Sanejeev on the issue of Kejriwal allegation
>> > ,
>> > till then you did not find any foreign issue,
>> > There are many patriots residing in foreign countries, they left India
>> due
>> > to many reasons, not because they are against this country.
>> > While living in foreign countries their soul always work for their
>> > mother
>> > land.
>> >
>> > Not like other parties we don't have any high command or superior
>> leaders,
>> > True sanjeev is one of the senior leader of our party and his position
>> > is
>> > based upon the party constitution which is very well approved by the
>> > "Election Commission of India'
>> > This party is not owned by any individual.
>> >
>> >
>> > If time permits I will try to add few other thinks tomorrow.
>> >
>> > regards
>>
>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://freedomteam.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ftilogo-new-300x183.jpg
> P. Sureshan,
> Advocate-on-record, Supreme Court Of India,
> NLC( India ) Law Office
> No. 90, Second Floor , Bank Enclave , Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92..... Ph:
> 9818083219,8802797432,01132081075
>