I really appreciate your guts writing "Today IAC has just helped in eliminating BJP in Karnataka".I am a Bangalorean and I do not think many people have heard of IAC in Karnataka.Are you claiming that after the elimination of BJP you brought in more corrupt Congress.SM Krishna,Dharam Singh,Karge,Moily etc have made more money from mining than any other politrian.SM Krishna is a billionaire .Compared to them Yeddiurappa is kindergarten stuff.He was a novic.Though it was favouritism,he helped his sons to corner few ceores openly.And his arrogance made him pay for it. Media as usual was only focussing on Yeddi and not on Congressmen.
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:29:57 +0530
From: sroy.mb@gmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Yet another "foreigner" to rule over us.
Dear Mandar
1) We are in training for a "war". Groups like these are not meant as polite debating societies - god knows there are enough of them on the net.
2) The history in Doc Arun's case is here
http://rti4citizens.blogspot.in/2013/05/iacrg-fw-loosing-hope-for-veterans.html
http://rti4citizens.blogspot.in/2013/02/re-iacrg-setup-new-nation_9.html
3) IAC's "agenda" is very much on track. We are apolitical.
4) Recent panchayat results in West Bengal and Andhra Pradesh clearly shows how IAC and other strategic vote blocs will operate. In WB, out of 3,000 odd panchayats the BJP could manage just 5 and all its local workers are shell shocked. In AP the BJP is irrelevant and got less than 2% of the vote (and is banking its all all on TDP). These are states which have 40+ seats each in LS versus Gujarat's 20. The Congress was equally rogered (comparatively/ base effect) in these states - so IAC's "apolitical" approach works and is showing the way to other organised vote banks - Muslims / Sikhs etc who we closely network with.
5) The BJP barking dogs on this mailing list had better understand clearly that "anti-Congress-ism" is not quite the same thing as "pro-BJP-ism" (and nor is "anti-BJP-ism" a sign of "pro-Congress-ism" - a pox on both your houses), and the more they bark for Narendra Modi the better the voters get alerted not to vote for him/his party as all the poll results are showing ever since he was projected as PM.
Sarbajit
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
navnith
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:29:57 +0530
From: sroy.mb@gmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Yet another "foreigner" to rule over us.
Dear Mandar
1) We are in training for a "war". Groups like these are not meant as polite debating societies - god knows there are enough of them on the net.
2) The history in Doc Arun's case is here
http://rti4citizens.blogspot.in/2013/05/iacrg-fw-loosing-hope-for-veterans.html
http://rti4citizens.blogspot.in/2013/02/re-iacrg-setup-new-nation_9.html
3) IAC's "agenda" is very much on track. We are apolitical.
** IAC dictates terms all too clearly to political parties which keep begging for our votes.
**IAC believes in eliminating corruption wherever it is found. Today IAC has just helped in eliminating BJP in Karnataka. Tomorrow IAC can eliminate, say, Congress in Delhi - IAC only decides which is the lesser corruption. IAC is APOLITICAL which means IAC has the best knowledge of local trends and voting patterns down to booth/block levels so that IAC can eliminate maximum corruption with least efforts. Knowledge is power supreme, and our superior knowledge allows IAC to leverage its strength very well indeed.
**Why should IAC eliminate only 1 or 2 corrupt netas to prove its bonafides to media or anyone else, when we clean them ALL out at regular intervals ??"
**IAC believes in eliminating corruption wherever it is found. Today IAC has just helped in eliminating BJP in Karnataka. Tomorrow IAC can eliminate, say, Congress in Delhi - IAC only decides which is the lesser corruption. IAC is APOLITICAL which means IAC has the best knowledge of local trends and voting patterns down to booth/block levels so that IAC can eliminate maximum corruption with least efforts. Knowledge is power supreme, and our superior knowledge allows IAC to leverage its strength very well indeed.
**Why should IAC eliminate only 1 or 2 corrupt netas to prove its bonafides to media or anyone else, when we clean them ALL out at regular intervals ??"
4) Recent panchayat results in West Bengal and Andhra Pradesh clearly shows how IAC and other strategic vote blocs will operate. In WB, out of 3,000 odd panchayats the BJP could manage just 5 and all its local workers are shell shocked. In AP the BJP is irrelevant and got less than 2% of the vote (and is banking its all all on TDP). These are states which have 40+ seats each in LS versus Gujarat's 20. The Congress was equally rogered (comparatively/ base effect) in these states - so IAC's "apolitical" approach works and is showing the way to other organised vote banks - Muslims / Sikhs etc who we closely network with.
5) The BJP barking dogs on this mailing list had better understand clearly that "anti-Congress-ism" is not quite the same thing as "pro-BJP-ism" (and nor is "anti-BJP-ism" a sign of "pro-Congress-ism" - a pox on both your houses), and the more they bark for Narendra Modi the better the voters get alerted not to vote for him/his party as all the poll results are showing ever since he was projected as PM.
Sarbajit
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:08 AM, Mandar U Jog <mandarjog@gmail.com> wrote:
Sarabjit,
This language is clearly uncalled for.
Perhaps there is some history here that We are not aware of.
People will define for themselves what is "their country" and where their loyalties are.
Your response does not advance the agenda of IAC.
If I were the moderator I would not have posted your response.
Mandar U Jog
On Aug 11, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Dr Arun
>
> The problem with you so-called patriot NRI's is that you try to
> control events in India (which is no longer "your" country) with your
> money and by supporting every CON-MAN / FRAUDY who approaches you
> with a sob-story and tale of woe. We saw it with previous IAC, present
> AAP and with Khalistanis and LTTE and SIMI etc. etc.
>
> THIS IAC has not approached you for even 1 paise / cent, and clearly
> says we don't need /want your money. So all you NRI "patriot" f***ers
> please stay where you are and keep the f*** out of India.
>
> In the old days you would have had to PUBLICLY eat 6 doses of cow-shit
> before you were allowed back in. But, now our bankrupt govt takes
> dollars (and RBI Governors) from any source no questions asked.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On 8/11/13, Kumar Arun <kumar2786@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear Mr. Sarabjit Roy,
>> Please do intense investigations about the "foreigner" but born Indian,
>> bring "anything and everything" which he has done knowingly or unknowingly
>> to occupy the seat of RBI governor. Until, then your cry will go not far
>> rather you will be considered a biased or jealous individual. Let me also
>> tell you that there are thousands if not millions of deeply rooted "patriot
>> of India" living abroad including USA compare to you and people like you.
>> Respectfully,
>> Dr. Kumar Arun
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.