Re: [IAC#RG] Congress tables RTI Amendment Bill 2013 in Lok Sabha

dear sarbajit
the fundamental issue raised by u is that the proposed amendment is good for the public u did not place any point in support of this argument. parliamentary competance is different issue and every body knows that the proposed law will be approved by Court.unless and until public sentiment is raised against the bill it will have a smooth passage which u like to be happens. still u accuse others with vested intrest in opposing the bill .can tell ur interst in getting this bill passed in a simple language without giving any old age thearies to disregard valid point.being an office bearer of a paper party I against this bill. that my intrest that is all

Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Sureshan

1) I was probably appearing in SC when you were in diapers.

2) You have not read my previous 2nd para properly and are twisting my words deliberately. I had nowhere said that Parliament cannot pass an amending law retrospectively. I said such curative law has no force if it is passed in capacity of Parliament sitting as an appellate over the courts. I was well aware of "HOODA" judgment while writing that para.

3) As an AOR and office bearer of a Political Party, you are a vested interest, so I thank you deeply for making the legal case for Congress and BJP etc. so that we all better understand the issues involved.

Sarbajit

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:

parliament can't pass law to override the effect of a judgment passed by courts I don't understand stand the basis of such ridiculous statements. A person who studied on diggy school of thought can only come with such stupid arguments. supreme court in HUDA judgment ,after analysing variuos earlier authority including Indira gandhi raj Narayn case held that parliament can pass law retrospectively to change the basis of a judgment. but cannot pass a law to simply override the effect of particular law sitting just like an appellate authority. the present amendment is well within the power of parliament they are trying to remove the basis for passing an order

Navnith Krishnan <navkris@hotmail.com> wrote:

Dear Sarbajit,
 
How do you think that we will get RTI information about political parties faster once the amenment is passed. As an expert on RTI,can you clarify?
navnith

 

 

 

---

Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 02:27:58 +0530
From: sroy.mb@gmail.com

To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Congress tables RTI Amendment Bill 2013 in Lok Sabha

Dear Gp Cap Rao

Its the oldest trick in the book, to first create the problem and then offer yourself as part of the solution.

These anti-RTI-amendment wallahs are mostly either foreign financed or Congress/NAC stooges. (They are financed in crores - not lakhs)

Starting from Aruna Roy and ending with Bhaskar Prabhu, with Anjali Bharadwaj, Nikhil Dey, Harsh Mander, Shekhar Singh, Shailesh Gandhi, Venkatesh Nayak, etc thrown in for good measure.

I say its a damn good thing if the RTI Amendment Bill is passed as it is and as soon as possible (even with the wobbly section 31). We will get RTI info about Political Parties faster.

Sarbajit

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Venkata Rao <bvrao39@hotmail.com> wrote:

I find 'Political Language' in the trail mail.
 
RTI amendment is moved by Congress. Mail states that this is opposed " by a small section of anti-national NGO persons closely associated with the Congress Party who claim to be 'thekedars' of RTI.
 
Can the contradictions be clarified in " simple (non-emotional/apolitical) language", please. 
 
BV Rao 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresi