Re: [IAC#RG] Judical System

Sir,

While the governments may be responsible for not filling vacancies in courts, it is the courts themselves that add avoidable work to their already overloaded schedule. In management practice, there is the system of case studies that reveal the strength and weaknesses in the procedures follfowed and  of the organisations.

The Supreme Court must engage IIMs to study the entire judicial system. I have strong reason to believe that there is need for business process reengineering in the judicial system. For instance, the courts, including the SC, spend considerable time in hearing bail applications and appeal against the interim orders and the actual trial has to remain pending.  

The offices of the courts are as open to corruption as any other office in the government and at every step litigants have to shell out money.

 

The only profession that benefits is the legal profession. the litigant loses all the way and still does not get justice for tens of years.

It is nice to preach to have faith but how does have faith in a system riddled with so many problems and extremely inefficient output.

 

I think we ar a very patient and tolerant society that we are tolerating such systems without demur.

 

Vinay Shankar

On 8 January 2013 13:01, arun joshi <colarun.joshi@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Sir,

I am an optimist by nature though losing it due to the high horse the judiciary sits on. They do not realise how much people suffer due to their laid back attitude.

They do not have an enviable record to show and I do not see them making any efforts to make amends.

Very recently I have forgone a sum of Rs 7 lacs from a PSU dreading to get into the web of Judicial terrorism. Believe you me our courts are experts at administering slow deaths. 

I will request the Honourable Judiciary to shake themselves out of the slumber.

Hope this does not aggregate contempt of Court inviting wrath on a disillusioned citizen who pays his taxes honestly.

I appreciate your enthusiasm and optimism.

With Regards 

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Jasminder Dhillon <biloodhilon@yahoo.com> wrote:

The country must continue to have faith in our judicial system.
However it needs to be emphasised that it can only function when the following judicial reforms are forced on the govt by the public--
1.Filling up all vacancies of judges at all levels.The selection procedure should be done by a judicial Commission and not by the govt,as is being done.Most of the courts are functioning at 50% or less than the auth numbers.
2. A time bound limit must be laid down for the completion and issue of the judgement my the Courts in all cases ie Civil,Criminal etc .No case can /should go on for more than one year.All civil cases must be decided within 6 months and all others within 12 months.
3. Adjournments should only be given for max 6 days and that also not more than 4 times,2 for the plaintiff and 2 for the respondent.The case can then only be finalised.People will then start having faith in the judiciary.
3.Police reforms must be comleted within 2 months and made independent of the political/IAS .LOK PAL Bill must be passed with CBI becoming independent.
4.THe courts will save the people and the country.
5Let us force the govt to take action
B S DHILLON

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

--
Col Arun Joshi(Veteran)
The INFANTEER
CONSERVE WATER
USE BIODEGRADABLE PACKING MATERIAL

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in