Disclosure of the RDC enquiry Report on alleged Idol Theft in Biraja Temple of Jajpur district cannot be disclosed , says Chief Information Commissioner.
Dear friends
On dated 5.6.2010 , I had submitted RTI Application to the PIO, Department of Law, Govt. of Odisha seeking copy of the RDC enquiry Report on alleged Idol Theft in Biraja Temple of Jajpur district. In response to RTI Application, the PIO intimated on 29.6.10 that disclosure of the requested information would be violative of section 8(1)(c ) and (h) of the RTI Act. Against the decision of the PIO, I made first appeal to the First Appellate Authority who rejected it and upheld the decision of the PIO. I challenged the decision in the Information Commission through complaint petition on dt. 13.8.10 which was registered as CC No. 2952/10.
After around 2 years, State Chief Information Commissioner started hearing and heard 6 times . During hearing the PIO submitted that there was demand to place the enquiry report in Odisha Legislative assembly. Such request of the Hon'ble Members of the assembly could not be conceded to since the scrutiny of the report is not yet over. It is apprehended that if the contents of the report are disclosed, it may obstruct effective deal of the report and in fact, it may impede the process of further probe and prosecution of offenders which will violate section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The Commission agreed with this argument and said that sharing the information with complainant would also cause a breach of privilege of the State Legislature { section 8(1)(c)}.
It needs to be mentioned here that the incident occurred in 2004 and in view large protest and demand to take action against Mr. Prafulla Ghadei, then then Minister who was allegedly involved in this case , Chief Minister directed RDC, Central Division to make an enquiry into the matter. RDC enquired into the matter and produced the report to State Govt. in the same year. Though 8 years have passed, the Govt. has neither disclosed the report not taken any action against the culprit on the basis of the report. I think the State Govt. with malafide intention is not willing to disclose the report to save the culprits. When the enquiry is over and report produced, why the Govt. is sitting idle on the report without taking any action even after 8 years. The ground cited by the Commission for not disclosing the report is vague and useless. As It was administrative order for enquiry, breach of privilege of the assembly does not arise here . I will challenge the decision of the Commission in Odisha High Court.
Pradip Pradhan
M-99378-43482
Date- 6.1.13
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.