Hum Janenge: Re: [Hum] Fwd: [IAC] Arvind Kejriwal and party no longer with IAC movement

Monday, November 12, 2012

Re: [Hum] Fwd: [IAC] Arvind Kejriwal and party no longer with IAC movement

Dear Justice Kamleshwar Nath,

I am deeply obliged to you for sending me your thought-provoking write-up. I feel that the whole issue boils down to: what may we do? There is a proverb in Punjabi: you can wake up one who is asleep but how to 'wake up' one who is awake but only pretending to be unaware. Yet, the efforts must continue in whatever way we are capable of making these.

I am also grateful for your greetings for Diwali and wish you a very happy and bright Diwali.

With regards,

YP Anand

From: Justice Kamleshwar Nath <justicekn@gmail.com>
To: hum@lists.riseup.net; Gandhian Satyagraha Brigade <gandhiansb@gmail.com>; Transparency International India <info@transparencyindia.org>; S. K. Agarwal TII <snehsantosh@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 1:08 PM
Subject: RE: [Hum] Fwd: [IAC] Arvind Kejriwal and party no longer with IAC movement

Is it all 'confusion worse confounded'? Is 'India Against Corruption' a Society; is it a Society registered under the Societies' Registration Act 1860? If it is not a Society, then is it merely a 'group of persons in association with each other' under Article 19(1)(c) of Constitution of India? If yes, then what are the particulars of each of the persons in the 'group'? Is it a legal entity entitled to sue and liable to be sued; if so, by what name?

Now please do not mar the fair concept of India Against Corruption, because the CONCEPT has helped the PEOPLE to stand up as ONE throughout the length and breadth of the Country against the prevailing massive Corruption all around. The genius of the man who created the 'phrase' deserves praise; and if he and his supporters do not want to debunk the concept, they may give serious thought to convert IAC into a regular Society as known to Law, and join hands with Arvind Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan, Kiran Bedi and several other anti-corruption crusaders well recognized by the People as leaders of anti-corruption movement.

It is recognized by all that a 'political alternative' is absolutely necessary for making an effective dent into current political inertia of protecting crime and corruption. Pro-crime/corruption takes shelter behind the so-called representative character of our Parliament because they know that they can successfully thwart any anti-corruption measure through Parliament. History records PM Narasimha Rao's corruption in Jharkhand Mukti Morcha matter to prevent the fall of his Government, that for 50 years the Parliamentary snags have prevented enacting an effective Lokpal Act, that properties continue to be amassed in Benami Transactions despite Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act 1988 through the device of not framing Rules to effectuate the Statute, that persons with criminal antecedents continue to be elected to Parliament and Legislatures, that Section 8(4) of Representation of People Act, which is blatantly supportive of a Convicted Parliamentarian or Legislator, is not repealed, that in effect vast majority of Members of Parliament and Legislatures do not represent the aspirations of the People who elect them, that Parliamentary Privilege of immunity from action under Article 105(2)/ 194(2) of the Constitution continue to be abused, that no roll of their duties was ever framed to be performed within their Constituencies or some sort of monitoring of their performance for the People to see – so on & so forth. The manner in which important laws are not framed under the so-called Supremacy of Parliament, despite repeated pronouncements of Supreme Court that Sovereignty vests in the People and only the Constitution of India is 'Supreme' – all call for a credible Political Alternative in the Parliament whatever the strength of the 'alternative party' may be. AAM AADMI PARTY is a good name.

The Nation will be grateful if the confusion is cleared at the earliest. May God be with you in your ventures of National Causes. With Deepawali Greetings,

Yours sincerely,

From the Desk of :

Justice Kamleshwar Nath

Retd.	:	Up-Lokayukta ( Karnataka ), Vice Chairman – C.A.T ( Allahabad ), Judge – High Court ( Lucknow & Allahabad )
Address	:	`Gunjan', C - 105, Niralanagar, Lucknow : 226 020. Uttar Pradesh , India
Phone(s)	:	+91-522-2789033 & +91-522-4016459. Mobile : +91-9415010746

From: hum-request@lists.riseup.net [mailto:hum-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of IAC INFO
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 6:26 PM
To: hum@lists.riseup.net
Subject: [Hum] Fwd: [IAC] Arvind Kejriwal and party no longer with IAC movement

Dear Sarbajit and friends
FYI
The copy of 3rd email issued by IAC(Arvind) recently.
Ajay

The general press release has already been issued to local media by IAC-HQ as planned from the official IAC PR email ID. It has been clarified in it that you may be issuing your own statement later. We can tweak everything in your statement. Copy of the general press release as sent out is being uploaded right now to IAC private mailing list also.

Ash

On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 4:38 PM, <parivartanindia@gmail.com> wrote:

Don't issue any press release. I discussed with Prashant and a few others. Will discuss with everyone and then make it public.

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

From: Ash IAC-Media <ash.indiaagainstcorruption@gmail.com>

Sender: indiaagainstcorruption-request@lists.riseup.net

Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:34:28 +0530

To: indiaagainstcorruption<indiaagainstcorruption@lists.riseup.net>

ReplyTo: indiaagainstcorruption@lists.riseup.net

Subject: [IAC] Arvind Kejriwal and party no longer with IAC movement