Thursday, August 16, 2012

Re: [HumJanenge] Supervision of Mr. Rajiv Mathur (Information Commissioner)

Dear Shri Roy sahib:

I am much appreciative of the email you have sent and the fine
analysis you have carried out.
One wishes the system functions in a more equitable way.
Thank you for taking up such analyses and helping the ones who need
such serious inputs.

With kind regards and much Respect.
Sincerely,
dev chopra
9810338049
***

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> Shri Satyananda Mishra-ji
> Chief Information Commissioner of India
> Central Information Commission
> August Kranti Bhawan
> New Delhi
>
> By EMAIL
>
> 16-Aug-2012
>
> Respected Sir
>
> I am constrained to report to you, in the larger public interest, the
> inefficiency in the Registry of Mr.Rajiv Mathur, which is causing a
> tremendous imbalance in the disposal rate of the Commission.
>
> This can be illustrated with the example of the cause list for today
> 16-August-2012
>
> Whereas IC-Ms. Annapurna Dixit has 23 cases listed before her,
> regularly spaced out at 15 minute intervals, starting from 10 AM till
> 5:00 PM with barely an hour for lunch, IC-Mr.Rajiv Mathur has only 8
> cases listed, spread 30 minutes apart starting from 10:30AM till 4:00
> PM with a generous lunch break of over 2 hours. Mr. Mathur's sedentary
> routine may also be compared (unfavourably) to IC-Mr. M.L.Sharma's who
> had 24 matters listed today with spacing of 10 minutes between them.
>
> That Mr. Mathur's routine is so regular is evident because his
> schedule for tomorrow is equally leisurely with 8 cases listed again.
>
> This slow pace is especially surprising because Mr. Mathur's decisions
> are laconic and can be copy pasted by any competent stenographer in
> under 1 minute. Not surprisingly, I find that IC. Mr. Basant Seth's
> causelist to be even worse than Mr. Mathur's, by having only 7 matters
> listed before him today.
>
> In these circumstances, may i respectfully SUGGEST that it would be
> far better if double benches were formed so that these new Information
> Commissioners can learn the RTI ropes in an accelerated fashion rather
> than experimenting on hapless citizens who have endured waiting
> periods of many years to be heard at the Commission and who don't
> deserve such shabby treatment or orders.
>
> With best wishes
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> New Delhi

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.