Monday, August 13, 2012

Re: [HumJanenge] Satyanand Mishra equates penalty under RTI Act to dealth penalty

Dear Girish

I see no reason why I should defend the indefensible (even though you
want me too).

I suggest that YOU send this decision to Mr. Mishra in the manner / mode I
usually adopt (or in your usual manner). I am curious to see how Mr. Mishra
responds to you.

PS: the PIO was of DoPT - so maybe that had something to do with it.

Sarbajit


On 8/13/12, Girish Mittal <rtng.mittal@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems that Mr. Mishra believes that penalty should be imposed only on
> rarest of rare cases as is evident from the attached decision note.
>
> He has observed that the information has been provided during hearing, but
> has made no note of the fact of delay inspite of the show cause notice and
> the information was provided only during show cause hearing...
>
> I am not guessing what defence Mr. Roy on this??
>
> Girish Mittal
>

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.