Dear Friends,
There is a lot of truth in the trailing mail. Let the brave, honest and fighter RTI activists exploit all rules to bring the truth to the people.
Now that the National e Governance Plan (NEGP) since 2005 has been allowed to languish deliberately by a directionless vision, apologetic implementation and political apathy contrary to the sensible implementation by the top 40 least corrupt countries, RTI activists can demand total insight into its structure for its implementation, year-on-year budgetary allocation, achievement of laid down targets, the final disposal of NEGP. many more insights as perceived by our legal luminaries. Is NEGP going to be a time less plan unmindful of targets and achievements unlike India's best run project Delhi Metro can be revealed to the people of the country by the RTI activists.
Sh Sarbajit, you can really play a yeoman role in this. As a moderator of this wonderful group, you can encourage people to discuss NEGP, a real key to accelerate economy and minimize corruption and crime as inter-alia a fool proof nation wide on-line complaint system very much a part of NEGP must be implemented with responsibility and accountability for the redressal of complaints of 1.15 bn ordinary citizens as 50 mn citizens can afford to manage the redressal of their own complaints. Lt Col Vinod Khare has also mentioned this in his brief mail addressed for consideration by the honorable members discussing strategies to combat corruption.
Anna went for Lokpal and Ramdev is going for black money, both are anti corruption laws. NEG is in the implementation domain, a real proven deterrent instrument as all least corrupt countries have proved by having their own NEGP implemented. It leaves an indelible trail of all financial and favoring crimes which only will come handy to prosecute and punish the economic offenders who have always managed to avoid prison. CVC, CAG, CBI, CID et al still can be with governments but when they can not manipulate evidence, courts become strong and justice is delivered. This is the power of well implemented NEGP which will still be required even if Lokpal, Lokayuktas or black money laws are passed.
Hoping that Sh Sarbajit would take this up and HJ becomes a platform for RTI activists to focus on the tangible gains for the nation out of the RTI provisions.
With warm regards,
Col Mahesh Khera
this mail was perhaps written a few years ago - but that only adds to its value as it remains valid and correct and proved further - A shame for all the true Indians
What is wrong with us IndiansALL INDIANS MUST READ THISI would like to sum up our performance in the 20th century in one sentence. Indians have succeeded in countries ruled by whites, but failed in their own.
This outcome would have astonished leaders of our independence movement. They declared Indians were kept down by white rule and could flourish only under self-rule. This seemed self-evident harsh reality today is that Indians are succeeding brilliantly in countries ruled by whites, but failing in India. They are flourishing in the USA and Britain.
But those that stay in India are pulled down by an outrageous system that fails to reward merit or talent, fails to allow people and businesses to grow, and keeps real power with Netas, Babus, and assorted manipulators. Once Indians go to white-ruled countries, they soar and conquer summits once occupied only by whites.
Rono Dutta has become head of United Airlines, the biggest airline in the world. Had he stayed in India, he would have no chance in Indian Airlines. Even if the top job there was given to him by some godfather, a myriad Netas, Babus and trade unionists would have ensured that he could never run it like United Airlines.
Rana Talwar has become head of Standard Chartered Bank, one of the biggest multinational banks in Britain, while still in his 40s. Had he been in India, he would perhaps be a local manager in the State Bank, taking orders from Babus to give loans to politically favoured clients.
Rajat Gupta is head of McKinsey, the biggest management consultancy firm in the world. He now advises the biggest multinationals on how to run their business. Had he remained in India he would probably be taking orders from some Sethji with no qualification save that of being born in a rich family.
Lakhsmi Mittal has become the biggest steel baron in the world, with steel plants in the US, Kazakhstan, Germany, Mexico, Trinidad and Indonesia. India's socialist policies reserved the domestic steel industry for the public sector. So Lakhsmi Mittal went to Indonesia to run his family's first steel plant there. Once freed from the shackles of India, he conquered the world.
Subhash Chandra of Zee TV has become a global media king, one of the few to beat Rupert Murdoch. He could never have risen had he been limited to India, which decreed a TV monopoly for Doordarshan. But technology came to his aid: satellite TV made it possible for him to target India from Hong Kong . Once he escaped Indian rules and soil, he soared.
You may not have heard of 48-year old Gururaj Deshpande. His communications company, Sycamore, is currently valued by the US stock market at over $ 30 billion, making him perhaps one of the richest Indians in the world. Had he remained in India , he would probably be a Babu in the Department of Telecommunications.
Arun Netravali has become president of Bell Labs, one of the biggest research and development centres in the world with 30,000 inventions and several Nobel Prizes to its credit. Had he been in India , he would probably be struggling in the middle cadre of Indian Telephone Industries. Silicon Valley alone contains over one lac Indian millionaires.
Sabeer Bhatia invented Hotmail and sold it to Microsoft for $ 400 million. Victor Menezes is number two in Citibank. Shailesh Mehta is CEO of Providian, a top US financial services company. Also at or near the top are Rakesh Gangwal of US Air, Jamshd Wadia of Arthur Andersen, and Aman Mehta of Hong Kong Shanghai Banking Corp.
In Washington DC, the Indian CEO High Tech Council has no less than 200 members, all high tech-chiefs. While Indians have soared, India has stagnated. At independence India was the most advanced of all colonies, with the best prospects.
Today with a GNP per head of $370, it occupies a lowly 177th position among 209 countries of the world. But poverty is by no means the only or main problem. India ranks near the bottom in the UNDP's Human Development Index, but high up in Transparency International's Corruption Index.
The Neta-Babu raj brought in by socialist policies is only one reason for India 's failure. The more sordid reason is the rule-based society we inherited from the British Raj is today in tatters. Instead money, muscle and influence matter most.
At independence we were justly proud of our politicians. Today we regard them as scoundrels and criminals. They have created a jungle of laws in the holy name of socialism, and used these to line their pockets and create patronage networks. No influential crook suffers. The Mafia flourish unhindered because they have political links.
The sons of police officers believe they have a licence to rape and kill (ask the Mattoo family). Talent cannot take you far amidst such rank misgovernance. We are reverting to our ancient feudal system where no rules applied to the powerful. The British Raj brought in abstract concepts of justice for all, equality before the law. These were maintained in the early years of independence. But sixty years later, citizens wail that India is a lawless land where no rules are obeyed.
I have heard of an IAS probationer at the Mussorie training academy pointing out that in India before the British came, making money and distributing favours to relatives was not considered a perversion of power, it was the very rationale of power. A feudal official had a duty to enrich his family and caste. Then the British came and imposed a new ethical code on officials. But, he asked, why should we continue to choose British customs over Desi ones now that we are independent?
The lack of transparent rules, properly enforced, is a major reason why talented Indians cannot rise in India . A second reason is the Neta-Babu raj, which remains intact despite supposed liberalisation. But once talented Indians go to rule-based societies in the west, they take off. In those societies all people play by the same rules, all have freedom to innovate without being strangled by regulations.
This, then, is why Indians succeed in countries ruled by whites, and fail in their own. It is the saddest story of the century.
Best wishes
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.