Re: [HumJanenge] Re: No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.

Mr Sarbajit,

Wow, cannot believe your appreciation of IC(SS) !

I do not know about the "seasoned bureaucrat" part, but she definitely

passes strange orders as an IC.

Here is a sample:

http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SS_A_2012_000018_M_77498.pdf 

The Commission has received second appeal dated  24.8.2011 from Shri

S.R.   Yadav,   Bikaner,   u/s 19 of the RTI Act, 2005..............

.

.

.

3. The appellant filed first appeal dated 7.4.2011 before appellate authority

& Chairman, Bar Council of Rajasthan, Jodhpur, which was also not decided

by the appellate authority.

4. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under the RTI Act, the matter is

remitted to Appellate Authority   &  Chairman,   Bar   Council   of   Rajasthan,

Jodhpur, with a copy of second appeal, with the following directions: 

                 

i) In case the first appeal dated 7.4.2011 has not been disposed of by AA,

he should dispose of the first appeal by passing a speaking order, after

hearing the parties in the matter,  within two weeks of receipt of this

order.

   ii) In case AA has already disposed of the first­appeal, he should furnish a

copy of his order to the appellant  within one week of receipt of this................

========

(NOTE: There are many more similar ones)

Isn't the CIC the second appellate authority ?

RTIwanted

---

From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2012 7:33 PM
Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.

.

.

.

IC(SS) is a seasoned bureaucrat, she doesn't make such foolish
mistakes. If I blindly had to chose between  supporting an order of
hers versus the say of some disgruntled RTI activist, I would chose
her order any day.

Sarbajit


>