Sunday, February 26, 2012

Re: [HumJanenge] No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.

My Inference with the Statistics which you brought out indicates that the Three new ICs going to be appointed will enjoy ! or Shall i also Deduce that Each case Now Heared will have Enough Time for Hearing relevant or irrelevant things on Both sides , because all our hearings and Also videio Conferences end up with an maximum 12 minutes !
N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004.


--- On Sun, 26/2/12, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Subject: [HumJanenge] No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.
> To: "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Sunday, 26 February, 2012, 10:21 PM
> Dear members
>
> I have just had a PRIVATE chat with some people authorised
> to speak on
> behalf of CIC (I am fighting them in a case before SC)
>
> 1) The actual outstanding pendency in the CIC is only around
> 2,700
> cases (data wef Jan/Feb 2012)
>
> 2) The biggest culprit in terms of cases stuck is
> IC(Shailesh Gandhi)
> who has around 800-900 cases stuck with him, some from as
> far back as
> July 2011. In comparison CIC(SM) is up to date with a a
> pendency of
> around 40-50 days.
>
> 3) No. 2 in terms of delay is IC(AD).
>
> 4) Whereas the CIC website reflects that around 27,000 cases
> are
> pending, there is some computer glitch and the figure has
> been
> multiplied by 10 due to file movement and poor dak
> records..
>
> I have no comments on these statements. My dear readers are
> encouraged
> to  share their views.to the list.
>
> Sarbajit
>

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.