Re: [HumJanenge] Government, judiciary not interested in RTI disclosures

Dear Activists,  I can give many cases against Delhi Development Authority where no paper moves from one desk to another till money is not paid. Secondly, DDA does not implement CIC decisions for years together (since 31.03.2009). No help is there from Secretary, DDA, Joint REGISTRAR in this matter. CIC and Vice-Chairman present one and the earlier one have been found helpless. I shall give full details on hearing from any activist who is ready to take up this case during Budget session. Hari Goyal rtidwarka@yahoo.co.in    --- On Sat, 25/2/12, Manoj Kamra <manojkamra@gmail.com> wrote: From: Manoj Kamra <manojkamra@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Government, judiciary not interested in RTI disclosures To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Date: Saturday, 25 February, 2012, 10:51 PM Dear Sarbajit Roy ji,            AICTE ---forget about 4.1.b , this notorous body of Mr.Kapil sibal is adamant to ignore applications.A little part of 4.1.b exposing major corruption for AICTE are------------------                     (a) list of engg colleges recognised by AICTE------- since last five/ten years -------yearwise                      (b) staff strength of AICTE regional/head office in last five/ten years (as same staff is handling 10-times work (10-times earning))                     (c) last two inspection reports of engg colleges of rajasthan(or any state) --------as per its RTI reply, AICTE declared to have destroyed and retaining only last inspection report whereas as per AICTE Act, inspection is to be carried out at least once in every two years.                                     Such suo-motu information especially, list of engg colleges is not being made available.                         , Highcourts-------- Even CIC decisions are not being complied. How can we expect 4.1.b information.      with regards manoj k.kamra On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Members VERY URGENT - please respond. One of our members, who is very high up with a leading newspaper/publishing group has kindly offered to file "at least" 1,000 RTI requests to PIOs of various CENTRAL public authorities asking for their suo-moto disclosure of section 4(1)(b). The most shocking cases of non-implementation will then highlighted as a daily series spanning over 2 weeks. I would therefore request our members to email me (or to the group) working EMAIL IDs of each and every CPIO of those CENTRAL public authorities they are interested in exposing. As I know that many of our members are otherwise quite lazy arm-chair RTI warriors, I shall regularly be posting this appeal to stimulate them into action. Sarbajit