Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Rules for Improving India using the Right to Information laws

Please elaborate.

On 10/10/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since Rule # 2 was so easy and well accepted, lets move on to Rule # 3.
>
> Rule # 3
>
> *DELAY IS GOOD !!! The more time the CPIO / FAA / CIC takes to dispose our
> request the better for us.*
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Now that members are clear on Rule #1, we move on to Rule #2
>>
>> Rule # 2
>>
>> *RTI is not used to get good things done, but is "mis"used by responsible
>> citizens to stop bad things from being done.*
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> RULE # 1:
>>>
>>> *RTI Act is not to be used, it is to be "mis"used.*
>>>
>>> This simple rule must be strictly followed if one is to achieve anything
>>> useful using RTI.
>>>
>>> Whenever you ask an "RTI activist" why they file RTIs and what they will
>>> do with the info (if they ever get it), the usual reply they give you is
>>> because the Govt "babus" are completely corrupt they will a) expose this
>>> information in the media b) file a PIL. Both these strategies are so
>>> hollow
>>> that it is no wonder that nothing substantial ever gets achieved.The real
>>> ways for an average citizen to use RTI to make a difference are
>>> counter-intuitive and firmly grounded in Rule # 1 as stated above.
>>
>>
>>
>

--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181