Re: [IAC#RG] Complaint of FRAUD played on WiFi stakeholders by GoNCTD

The fact of the matter is that although the AAP is still in the
process of learning the "art of corruption" which BJP has mastered
very well, there is no doubt that AAP will surpass BJP in it
eventually.

The WIFI scam modus operandi has been exposed by BJP's own version of
it. BJP controls the NDMC in Delhi.
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/free-wifi-service-starts-in-delhis-connaught-place/513251-11.html

Salient features

a) Reliance gets 680 poles on pilot basis to "test" 4G connectivity.
The value of each pole is Rs.20,000 per month. 4G/LTE needs a density
of 80 poles per sq.km. Delhi is 1,500 sq.kms so a 4G player like
Reliance needs 120,000 "poles"- Base Transceiver Stations =>Rs. 240
crores right of way per month per player owed to DELHI's
MUNICIPALITIES. Each of these BTS is about 100 feet in height and very
ugly and emits "non-ionising radiation"and operatesin the 2300 MhZ
band
In the State of Gujarat there are 4 such 4G/LTE licencees, so the
municipalities can get lots of money if they wish.

b) Tata-Docomo has been given Connaught Place. It is not known if any
tenders were called.

c) "Free" wifi is only for 20 minutes - that too with horrible speeds
- after that it is Re.20/hr. To access the "free" service you have to
give your private details like email ID/mobile number and give consent
to receive SPAM from the service providers. NDMC has created a
MONOPOLY for Tatas.

d) The reason that 4G/LTE players need access in "public spaces" is
that otherwise it needs an NOC from private property owners. If a
local municipality gives permission to erect a 30m tall cell tower
outside your bedroom window but on a public street you can't complain.
The mobile lobbies have also procured various judgments all claiming
there is no health risk from their towers.

In short, this entire "free" Wifi scam is to get "free/cheap" right of
way to erect 4G/LTE towers, which being much lower powered at 20W than
a 2G/3G conventional telephony tower, needs a higher density of towers
per sq.km for the projected data rates/capacities.

Sarbajit

On 5/2/15, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 2/5/14
> Dear Mr. Jain,
> We are not on this forum to enjoy' in the situations' as you term it. We are
> trying to make sense of the political motives behind the Govt. policies and
> programmes and how they are going to affect the common man/AAM Admi/ Mago
> people, specially of Central Govt. and by extention Delhi State Govt.
> AAP made a number of promises to the electorate and got elected by an
> overwhelming majority. WIFI is one of those promises.This should have a low
> priority compared to promises for schools, colleges, employment, water and
> electricity. But surprisingly WIFI has got the first priority and Mr.S. Roy
> being involved in Delhi developments for a long time specially after IAC,s
> 2011 JanAndholan, is following WIFI developments closely. It is in that
> context I made the observation that, 1. The Chief Minister administering
> oath of secrecy to Parliamentary secretary is not correct as the power
> should vest in the Lt. Governor. 2.Likewise it appears that to keep the
> flock togather, the Chief Minister has appionted 2/3 Parliamentary
> secretaries. So what the duties,powers and privileges of those MLAs as
> parliamentariey secretarys- is a legitimate question. Ultimately will all
> these lead to corruption is the legitimate concern of IACRegarding farmers
> plight, Mr.Vekataram had posted his views about a week a back. Surprisingly
> there is no comment or views expressed so far. That is the lip service we
> pay to the farming community.JKGaur
> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:59:14 +0530
> From: anil.jain@gmail.com
> To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Complaint of FRAUD played on WiFi stakeholders by
> GoNCTD
>
> For get about the role in WiFi dear interest holders, please focus on main
> issued relating to farmers and Common Bhartiya men. You have written more on
> the role in WiFi than anything else. I think even this forum is operation
> only for personal interest like any other politician.I cant Enjoy in this
> situation!!
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> 29/4/15Oath of office and secrecy can be administered by the Governor not
> the Chief Minister .If each Minister has 2/3 Parliamentary Secretary,their
> functions,powers etc. need to be defined.
>
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:53:05 +0530
> From: sroy.mb@gmail.com
> To: csdelhi@nic.in; secyit@nic.in
> CC: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net; ncpri@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [IAC#RG] Complaint of FRAUD played on WiFi stakeholders by GoNCTD
>
> To:
> The Hon'ble Chief Secretary of Delhi
>
> By EMAIL
>
> Sub: Complaint of FRAUD played on WiFi stakeholders by GoNCTD
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> I refer to my earlier complaint about role of Mr. Adarsh Shastri, MLA,
> in conducting the WIFI stakeholders consultations between 24-27th
> April 2015.
>
> I also refer to the PRESS RELEASE titled as "Delhi Chief Minister
> administers oath of office and secrecy to newly appointed
> Parliamentary Secretaries" dated as 27.04.2015. It seems this was done
> post lunch on 27.April.2015 but you can confirm the same from official
> records.
>
> In these circumstances I request to be provided complete information
> as to how Shri Adarsh Shastri participated as, and was also permitted
> to participate as, "Parliamentary Secretary to Minister IT" during the
> 3 day conference / stakeholders consultation on WIFI in Delhi, when he
> had not been administered any oath of office and secrecy till then. It
> is not clear to me how papers I had submitted to Secy/IT as part of a
> government consultation process could be disclosed to Mr. Adarsh
> Shastri or how any recommendation could be passed on WIFI in Delhi
> without considering my submissions or how Mr Shastri could even
> communicate with me officially.
>
> I reiterate that apparently Mr. Shastri was deliberately inserted into
> the WIFI decision making process by somebody without any authority,
> and so as to ensure that my submissions are not considered. It is
> pertinent that there is no information whatsoever on Delhi Govt
> website about powers, source of powers, job and scope of
> "Parliamentary Secretary" which I could easily locate.
>
> I would also request you to inquire into the circumstances whereby a
> Wifi task force has been formed in a completely opaque and
> non-transparent manner involving persons with dubious antecedents. In
> the alternative you may kindly ensure that all relevant records of
> Delhi Dialogue Commission for the Delhi-wide WIFI scheme are made
> public so that I may pursue this under vigilance angles.
>
> I again urge that the WIFI consultation process has been vitiated, and
> needs to be properly conducted 'de-novo' with full prior disclosure
> and transparency maintained throughout.
>
> Sincerely
>
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> Tel : 8010205897
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
>
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in