Re: [IAC#RG] JanLokPal Bill follies

I can very humbly request the "act-in-haste-and-repent-at -leisure club members to once again critically go through the comment doc. No need in rushing to respond in extra haste. Yes,we who have a conjoint tons of administrative/legal experience,including formation,and critical scrutiny of Statuates, have exercised our rilght to voice our thoughtful concerns on a matter of great public interest,and on which we have (not just now) for long being giving our views candidly. It will surprise me if any one could find one single sentence/phrase disputable in the doc circulated.It's not a political platform to talk in terms of "generalities",or in "vague" manner,but its a forum for intellectual discourse. Any point that meets stringent legal/practical requirement,at variance with the views expressed would be highly welcome/acceptable. SPM
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone

-----Original Message-----
From: "L. B. Thapa" <apasmalb@gmail.com>
Sender: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 15:15:37
To: vasant sardesai<vasant_sardesai@yahoo.co.in>
Reply-To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Cc: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>; Kumar Arun<kumar2786@hotmail.com>; Bharat Swabhiman Trust<missionbharatswabhiman@gmail.com>; Mukund Apte<mdapte@gmail.com>; Subramanian Swamy<swamy39@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] JanLokPal Bill follies

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in