Re: [IAC#RG] Most of Congress top leadership in Chattisgarh injured or dead in Maoist attack

thanks for your response
Sanjeev , and we all are responded to Somnath's mail.. no body from
FTI is running out of Critisism, We are ready to respond to any
critisisim if it is based upon sound reasoning. Ur allegations against
Sanjeev is baseless. He is still finding it difficult to find out
travel costs , even after serving for long. he is still working as he
so not attained a financial stability. With that much potential and
ability he is still finding very hard to sustain. Ur blaming a highly
honest person without any sufficient grounds. He left IAS not to make
money , He could have a immensely rich if he was with IAS. U must
understand as to how IAS class are ruling this country and amassing
wealth. Sanjeev Sabhlok is the rare kind of man whom the entire
country can hope for.


FTI has approved certain political parties in which their members can
join and work. the main idea for FTI is to spread the message of
classical liberalism. that is the one sort of policy which can give
total freedom and prosperity to any nation. FTI is closely worked
with team Anna as well when Kejriwal left him. Swami Ramdev is no the
only force for FTI, true we have made him to understand the ideas of
liberty and just like we did with Anna Hazare. Many political parties
and other organisations are part of SKC movement apart from Ramdev
which u did not want to realise. There is no hiding of truth or false
and baseless accusations against any body is encouraged in our group,
in which ur having expertise. If that kind mail which was having wild
allegations without any substance are acceptable ,and mail which is
based upon substance is not acceptable to ur group I can say sorry to
u ...


On 5/27/13, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Sureshan
>
> Your comments on IPL were circulated to the list. This is confirmed from
> our archives.
> https://lists.riseup.net/www/arc/indiaresists/2013-05/msg00267.html
>
> Your email was in response to my email to Dr. J.C.Batra Senior Advocate
> Supreme Court posing the ingredients of IPC 420 to him (you will admit
> surely that my own knowledge of IPC is not a trivial one). What came out in
> the media 2-3 days later was on expected lines.
>
> FYI, this list receives 200+ emails each day, out of which not more than 20
> are approved. Emails which conform to list rules/guidelines have a higher
> chance of being approved.
>
> Re: SKC, somebody emailed me a list of AAM Aadmi candidates, *FTI member
> Adv Somnath Bharti is on it.* Adv Somnath Bharti had made some very choice
> and apt remarks on FTI's duplicity and Sanjeev's megalomania on his blog
> http://www.somnathbharti.com/2013/04/respose-to-mr-sanjeev-sabhloks.html
> to which there is no public reply by Sanjeev / FTI.
>
> BTW, examples of your rejected messages (reproduced exactly) are:
>
> "From: Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com>
> To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
> Cc:
> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 22:17:19 +0530
> Subject: There was No relegion called hindu in anciant Bharat the consept
> of relegion itself not familiar in Bhatat It was Sanatan dharma which is
> most liberal was the way of life ' no one can be brahmin by birth if any
> doubt read chandyogyopanishad I challenging all to prove otherwise - u can
> refr any Upanishad ' Brihadaranyakam'Kadopanishad or Kenopanishad Apart
> from Chandogya
>
> From: SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, 26 May 2013 6:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Fw: Most of Congress top leadership in Chattisgarh
> injured or dead in Maoist attack
>
> Ur right Mr Dave My Mail to thi
> group is blocked I hate Nehruvian policies.The real problems to this
> country Sarbjit is nuisance to this country"
>
>
> From: SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, 24 May 2013 6:50 AM
> Subject: None
>
> It seems My Mails To this group are intentionaly blocked for the best
> reason known to u. U are not a suitable person to any social acrivism. It
> is better for u to leave this kind of movement and let the person who have
> broader mind to take care of public cause .If u are leading this movement
> that will remain nuisance to the country. U and aravind kejriwal etc are
> mere nuisance
>
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have earlier made variuos comments which are not appeared
>> None of the comments out of subjet example re.IPL scame i have given
>> specific details how a case can't registered later Law minister told that
>> he is trying ti bring law
>> Even after blocking my comment. Varuous comments appeared by thinking
>> that
>> delhi police is right.ur observation abt fti and sanjeev is wrong FTI is
>> not going to split or finish through skc. We have long strategy that is
>> perfectly fine. U can ur perspetion abt FTI If u wish.
>>
>> Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Sureshan P,
>>
>> Re: "*I know Sarbajit will block this as he know what is the reality.*"
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> You can be assured of a few things, unlike your FTI's
>> President-in-waiting, at IAC we don't
>>
>> - Hide what we say, we say it openly!!
>>
>>
>> - We allow even our worst opponents to make out their case over IACs
>> mailing lists (subject to netiquette). The corollary is also that we
>> don't
>> give one-sided versions and run away midway through debate (unlike
>> "you know who").
>>
>>
>> - We don't take money or sides,
>>
>> Additionally,
>>
>> At present we have 3 moderators for this list. All of us approve sensible
>> email post, (ie. posts which are lucid and make their points properly),
>> without looking at who the sender is ("face value" does not work with us
>> -
>> only good content does).
>>
>> BTW the moderation rules all of us use have been circulated on this list
>> many times in the past and can be accessed through our list's searchable
>> archives. One of these rules is about the maximum number of posts we
>> permit
>> to the list (daily and monthly).
>>
>> To address your issue,*
>> I personally believe that ALL politicians and ALL religious leaders are
>> corrupt (through and through). THAT is the REALITY !!
>> *
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In india there would big conspiracy behind every terror attacks. Even
>>> bombay terror attacks given good result to upa just like cargil to bjp.
>>> We
>>> should understand the real beneficiary of every terror strikes Amit Jogi
>>> son of ajit jogi Dreaming to rule not only chatishargh but whole
>>> India.some
>>> body should conduct detail study abt his assets. He is directly variuos
>>> NGOs .I know Sarbajit will block this as he know what is the reality.
>>>
>>> devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com wrote:
>>>
>>> I think Mr sarabjit Roy has asked very pertinent and relevant questions.
>>> and these must cross the mind of every right thinking person that if it
>>> is
>>> the duty of the State administration to provide proper security to the
>>> campaigning leaders, why was it not provided?.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>


--
http://freedomteam.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ftilogo-new-300x183.jpg
P. Sureshan,
Advocate-on-record, Supreme Court Of India,
NLC( India ) Law Office
257-F, Ground Floor,Street No-6, West Guru Angad Nagar, Laxmi Nagar,
Delhi-92..... Ph: 9818083219,8802797432