President rule is the only answer for our country . I am more or less certain that we will have MPs from about 25 different parties in our Lok Sabha , resulting in confusion for the next 5 years . After all president has to have his advisers to rule the country and that would be far better than the chaos expected . Sesahdri.
From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net [mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of rustom dalal
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 10:48 PM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net; anamikaiac@gmail.com; ddchop47@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] Chattisgarh for President's Rule ?
PRESIDENTS RULE MAY BE CONSIDERED FOR THE WHOLE COUNTRY. OUR PRESIDENT STARTED FROM A COMMUNUST BACKGROUND. THE IRONY IS THAT CHINA IS CAPITALIST
RUSTOM
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 21:48:34 +0800
From: parvez1942@yahoo.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net; anamikaiac@gmail.com; ddchop47@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Chattisgarh for President's Rule ?
Well paid off !
--- On Sun, 26/5/13, Anamika R <anamikaiac@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Anamika R <anamikaiac@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Chattisgarh for President's Rule ?
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Cc: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Date: Sunday, 26 May, 2013, 11:53 AMWhy does no one, including media, have the guts to go after the kingpin of scams in India?
Sent from my iPad
On 26-May-2013, at 4:59, devinder chopra <ddchop47@gmail.com> wrote:Sri Sarbajit Roy sahib:
What you say and surmise, Sire, is correct--President's rule may be the next outcome of all that is going on in our democratic India.
The question remains whether in a "civil war" situation, President rule will provide the Peace and solace that the general/good public deserves, in this integral part of our country.
The Chinese can walk in 18/19 kms of our Ladakh and we go namby-pamby and have our Foreign Minister go to Beijing and kow tow--if that is what is equal to showing our spine!
Unity of purpose and action amongst our political parties is the key issue, IF our independence and integrity as a democratic nation is concerned.
From a cricketing way-of-life to coalgates and a non-performing parliamentary polity, one wonders what else is in store for our children and grand-children.
Peace and regards.
devinder das chopra aka dev chopra in gurgaon
9810338049
On 25 May 2013 22:01, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
With this latest attack killing top Congress leaders, Chattisgarh (BJP ruled- Raman Singh as CM) seems likely for President's Rule. Elections are due in Nov. 2013 and Congress is not expected to do well.
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Monday, May 27, 2013
Re: [IAC#RG] Chattisgarh for President's Rule ?
There is no provision of President's rule at center.
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 9:23 PM, M.N.Seshadri <manavasi.seshadri@gmail.com> wrote:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.