Re: [IAC#RG] Most of Congress top leadership in Chattisgarh injured or dead in Maoist attack

hmmmm... 26/11 Mumbai Attack - no Maharashtra Govt. sacked, no presidential rule...

Assam was burning for 3 months, thousands of Hindus killed by Bangladeshis... no President rule...

Now because of few Congi leaders, who were not following Convoy rules of Naxal affected area, not following security tips of Security agencies, got dead... so suddenly President's Rule Bruhaha is going on...

NGOs "Gang" rockking fine... :) :)

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Sureshan

Your comments on IPL were circulated to the list. This is confirmed from our archives.
https://lists.riseup.net/www/arc/indiaresists/2013-05/msg00267.html

Your email was in response to my email to Dr. J.C.Batra Senior Advocate Supreme Court posing the ingredients of IPC 420 to him (you will admit surely that my own knowledge of IPC is not a trivial one). What came out in the media 2-3 days later was on expected lines.

FYI, this list receives 200+ emails each day, out of which not more than 20 are approved. Emails which conform to list rules/guidelines have a higher chance of being approved.

Re: SKC, somebody emailed me a list of AAM Aadmi candidates, FTI member Adv Somnath Bharti is on it. Adv Somnath Bharti had made some very choice and apt remarks on FTI's duplicity and Sanjeev's megalomania on his blog http://www.somnathbharti.com/2013/04/respose-to-mr-sanjeev-sabhloks.html
to which there is no public reply by Sanjeev / FTI.

BTW, examples of your rejected messages (reproduced exactly) are:

"From: Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Cc:
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 22:17:19 +0530
Subject: There was No relegion called hindu in anciant Bharat the consept of relegion itself not familiar in Bhatat It was Sanatan dharma which is most liberal was the way of life ' no one can be brahmin by birth if any doubt read chandyogyopanishad I challenging all to prove otherwise - u can refr any Upanishad ' Brihadaranyakam'Kadopanishad or Kenopanishad Apart from Chandogya

From: SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com>

Sent: Sunday, 26 May 2013 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Fw: Most of Congress top leadership in Chattisgarh injured or dead in Maoist attack

Ur right Mr Dave My Mail to thi
group is blocked I hate Nehruvian policies.The real problems to this country Sarbjit is nuisance to this country"

From: SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, 24 May 2013 6:50 AM
Subject: None

It seems My Mails To this group are intentionaly blocked for the best reason known to u. U are not a suitable person to any social acrivism. It is better for u to leave this kind of movement and let the person who have broader mind to take care of public cause .If u are leading this movement that will remain nuisance to the country. U and aravind kejriwal etc are mere nuisance

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:

I have earlier made variuos comments which are not appeared
None of the comments out of subjet example re.IPL scame i have given specific details how a case can't registered later Law minister told that he is trying ti bring law
Even after blocking my comment. Varuous comments appeared by thinking that delhi police is right.ur observation abt fti and sanjeev is wrong FTI is not going to split or finish through skc. We have long strategy that is perfectly fine. U can ur perspetion abt FTI If u wish.

Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Sureshan P,

Re: "I know Sarbajit will block this as he know what is the reality."

Thanks.

You can be assured of a few things, unlike your FTI's President-in-waiting, at IAC we don't

• Hide what we say, we say it openly!!

• We allow even our worst opponents to make out their case over IACs mailing lists (subject to netiquette). The corollary is also that we don't give one-sided versions and run away midway through debate (unlike "you know who").

• We don't take money or sides,
  

Additionally,

At present we have 3 moderators for this list. All of us approve sensible email post, (ie. posts which are lucid and make their points properly), without looking at who the sender is ("face value" does not work with us - only good content does).

BTW the moderation rules all of us use have been circulated on this list many times in the past and can be accessed through our list's searchable archives. One of these rules is about the maximum number of posts we permit to the list (daily and monthly).

To address your issue,
I personally believe that ALL politicians and ALL religious leaders are corrupt (through and through). THAT is the REALITY !!

Sarbajit

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:

  In india there would big conspiracy behind  every terror attacks. Even bombay terror attacks given good result to upa just like cargil to  bjp. We should understand the real beneficiary of every terror strikes Amit Jogi son of ajit jogi Dreaming to rule not only chatishargh but whole India.some body should conduct detail study abt his assets. He is directly variuos NGOs .I know Sarbajit will block this as he know what is the reality.

devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com wrote:

I think Mr sarabjit Roy has asked very pertinent and relevant questions. and these must cross the mind of every right thinking person that if it is the duty of the State administration to provide proper security to the campaigning leaders, why was it not provided?.

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

--
सुरेश चिपलूनकर
(Suresh Chiplunkar)
http://blog.sureshchiplunkar.com