Re: [IAC#RG] Chattisgarh for President's Rule ?

There is absolutely no probability of any President's rule in
Chhattisgarh because off these killings by the Maoists.

Sukla

On 26/05/2013, devinder chopra <ddchop47@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sri Sarbajit Roy sahib:
>
> What you say and surmise, Sire, is correct--President's rule may be the
> next outcome of all that is going on in our democratic India.
> The question remains whether in a "civil war" situation, President rule
> will provide the Peace and solace that the general/good public deserves, in
> this integral part of our country.
>
> The Chinese can walk in 18/19 kms of our Ladakh and we go namby-pamby and
> have our Foreign Minister go to Beijing and kow tow--if that is what is
> equal to showing our spine!
>
> Unity of purpose and action amongst our political parties is the key issue,
> IF our independence and integrity as a democratic nation is concerned.
>
> From a cricketing way-of-life to coalgates and a non-performing
> parliamentary polity, one wonders what else is in store for our children
> and grand-children.
>
> Peace and regards.
> devinder das chopra aka dev chopra in gurgaon
> 9810338049
>
>
> On 25 May 2013 22:01, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> With this latest attack killing top Congress leaders, Chattisgarh (BJP
>> ruled- Raman Singh as CM) seems likely for President's Rule. Elections
>> are
>> due in Nov. 2013 and Congress is not expected to do well.
>>
>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>
>


--
Peace Is Doable