Dear Ms Mukherjee,I read the latest book on Netaji SCB and saw the movie too.A person who resigns from a charmed service as ICS for the love of his country does not require to prove his loyalty. It shook the British.It is worth reading R M Lohia's book "Guilty Men of Partition"Pray how do you expect Nehru to give Netaji his rightful place in history ???Nehru could be very vindictive to fellow Indians.Do you realise that in the past 64 years a mirage has been created that it was only Gandhi & Nehru who were responsible for getting us Independence.? Even Sardar Patel finds no place leave aside the millions who actually suffered the violence of the Raj.After Reading"Churchill's Secret War" by Ms Mukherjee I realised that the people who suffered British atrocities the most were the people of Bengal, Bihar and Orrisa. Even during partition.Netaji SCB deserves much more than what our intellectual class has appropriated to him so far.With RegardsCol Arun Joshi(Veteran)On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Rina Mukherji <rina.mukherji@gmail.com> wrote:
That should be ideal, Mr Bhogal. But for that, we must let meritocracy rule. In our country, the Gandhis have been successful because we worship lineage and ancestry. Indira Gandhi was welcomed because she was Nehru's daughter, Rajiv because he was her son. The same went for the Gandhi bahus. It is as if there was no one to lead in this country of I billion. Right now, we have a hundred sons rising on the firmament!Why can't we look beyond?Rina MukherjiOn Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Virender Bhogal <vbhogal@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Ms Mukherji,
Let us not get caught up in the past to sort out our present and future. That is the very reason the GANDHIS hasve had a 'ball' all these years – because they produced one Gandhi after another in rapid succession.
Netaji is my personal ideal for a national leader, but if I said it any louder I will definitely need a helmet. However, I am convinced there is a Netaji waiting to emerge any moment, and when she/he does let us not mimic our past, let us join her/him and get rid of the evil that has grown monstrous from within our national adulation.
Virender BhogalOn Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Rina Mukherji <rina.mukherji@gmail.com> wrote:
There are several questions unanswered about Netaji's death. Why did the governments of Free India suppress all news about his disappearance. Often, one hears many non-Bengalis poke fun at Bengali ire on this issue( without really bothering to know the composition of the INA-which was truly representative of the Indian UNION) . It is time that Netaji's unbiased love for his country, and his respect for all Indians, irrespective of their faith, is acknowledged and strived for. It will make us a better nation, and a better people.There ought to be some thought spared for the INA martyrs too; one hears of how their contribution was totally ignored. They never received the respect due to freedom fighters, nor the minimum privileges. They fought in the most difficult terrain, braved enemy bullets and jungles to bring India closer to freedom.The Andamans were freed by the INA much before most of India became free. Yet, Netaji's contribution remains largely unsung!Rina MukherjiKolkataOn Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Ravindran P M <raviforjustice@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for sharing this immensely readable piece and a pertinent question to ponder.
regards n bw
raviOn Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Byline for 27 January 2013
Why was Bose diminished on Republic Day?
M.J. Akbar
We measure power through size. Check any political poster. The boss gets the biggest face. Others in the pecking order descend till the miniature at the end.
Why was Subhas Chandra Bose struggling among the also-rans in the Bengal Republic Day tableau? Swami Vivekananda, understandably, had pride of place. But it might have been better to keep Bose out of the jumble rather than literally reduce his stature. If Bengal forgets, how long will India remember the only Indian to head a government of united India?
Bose declared independence before the British gave it in 1947. His government in exile did not have Gandhi's sanction. It fought on the wrong side of the Second World War: but it was a proud and free government whose contribution to our freedom has been reduced by the domestic political forces he challenged.
Bose is an embarrassment to Congress because he challenged Gandhi, and was a powerful parallel icon to Nehru. Bose asked Indians to give him their blood, and he would give them freedom. Gandhi promised freedom without violence. Gandhi refused to join the British war effort in 1939; Bose went a step further, and led Indian troops on the side of the Germany-Italy-Japan axis. However, their horizon, freedom, was the same.
More than six decades later the argument might seem pedantic, and yet it is worth revisiting. Invaluable Indian blood and treasure helped Britain win the First World War. After victory, Britain reneged on its commitment to Indian self-rule within the empire without batting an eyelid. Instead of dominion status, Indians got vicious brutality at Jallianwala Bagh and the pernicious Rowlatt Act.
It is not generally known that Gandhi was not a pacifist: he served on British frontlines in the Boer and Zulu wars in South Africa, and was very eager to lead a medical unit to the killing fields of France in 1914, at the onset of the First World War. In 1918, Gandhi worked so hard as a recruiting agent for the British army, urging Gujaratis to prove they were not "effeminate" by picking up a gun, that he almost died of exhaustion. Farewell bhajans began to be sung before he recovered. Gandhi lost hope in Britain only when he felt betrayed.
Britain had as much to protect in 1945 as in 1918. London knew that its empire would unravel at the point where it had begun, in India, once India became independent. What pushed Britain towards the exit gate? Of course there was the irresistible momentum of Gandhi's nationwide struggle. But the British had faced this challenge before, in the non-cooperation movement 25 years before. The significant difference was the nationalist sentiment unleashed by Bose among Indians in uniform. Bose's Indian National Army [INA] showed them where their national loyalties should lie. Bose's war also inspired the young to surge beyond the confines of Congress.
Even Gandhi, who only had faint praise for Bose in a 1945 obituary ["Subhas Bose has died well. He was undoubtedly a patriot though misguided"], had to admit in an article published on 15 February 1946, "The hypnotism of the Indian National Army has cast its spell on us... [Netaji's] patriotism is second to none... He aimed high but failed. Who has not failed?... The lesson that Netaji and his army brings to us is one of self-sacrifice, unity irrespective of class and community, and discipline..." When the British put three INA officers — Shah Nawaz, a Muslim, Sahgal, a Hindu, and Dhillon, a Sikh — on trial for sedition, India exploded in wrath. Nehru said on 24 December 1945, "The INA trial has created a mass upheaval."
Bose broke the backbone of British rule when he destroyed trust between the British Raj and its armed forces. The eminently sensible Sir Claude Auchinleck, commander in chief, accepted that any extreme punishment for INA officers would make governance impossible, because Indians adored them as national heroes. This, he said, was the "general opinion held in India, not only by the public, but ... by quite a considerable part of the Indian Army as well".
Subhas Bose's contribution to the formation of a Republic of India was no less than that of the very greatest of our founding fathers. Bose proved in practice what an Indian secular state would be. At a time when the Muslim League was in ascendant, he had the love and trust of Muslims. He lived his dream of gender equality when he set up the Rani of Jhansi regiment, under the fiery and beautiful Lakshmi Swaminathan. When Bose told the Japanese he was setting up a women's-only force, they thought he was joking. I do not believe Bose could have fought alongside Hitler, who advised the British to shoot Gandhi dead, and resented the Japanese advance because he thought Asia was being lost to white Europeans. Hitler was an undisguised racist, as were all Nazis.
Perhaps India can survive without Bose. But such amnesia will only diminish India.
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
--Veteran Major P M RavindranYou may also like to visit:'Judiciary Watch' at www.vigilonline.com
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
--
+1 206 218 4660
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and solely intended for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete and/or destroy this message and any attachments immediately. It is prohibited to copy, distribute, disclose or use this e-mail and any attachments in any other way. I do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage resulting from the content of and/or the transmission of this message.
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in--
The INFANTEER
CONSERVE WATER
USE BIODEGRADABLE PACKING MATERIAL
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Monday, January 28, 2013
Re: [IAC#RG] Why was Bose diminished on Republic Day? (advance copy)
You are abolutely right. Why Sardar Patel, there were people like Maulana Azad , Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, the entire brigade of the Hindustan Republican Army ,who were pan-Indian in their activities and many many others who got relegated to also-rans. In fact, it was Sardar Patel who managed to keep India together at a difficult time in the years following our independence.
Nehru was not just vindictive, but stubborn and hot-tempered too. But everyone tolerated him and he was an object of adulation, possibly because he was the son of an immensely rich man. Hoami Vyarawalla has also spoken about how the decision to accept partition was pushed by Gandhi, and backed by Nehru ignoring the voices of protest from the likes of Azad, Ghaffar Khan, Kripalani and many others. Gandhi and Nehru relied on each other for support, and pushed forth their personal agenda. The voices of all others were drowned.
Neither of them were affected bythe partition. It was the innumerable millions-the Punjabis, the Bengalis, Sindhis , and Pathans who suffered a raw deal. I still remember the Sikh refugees of Kanpur-where I spent my childhood, and the numerous families who had fled to India, and lost every male relative to the savage hordes on the way.
There are families along the border-in Bengal -who recall how one fine morning- after a meeting at the village maidan-they woke up to realise that the farms that supplied their village hat-were now a separate nation. The shock took years to sink in!
Rina
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:59 PM, arun joshi <colarun.joshi@gmail.com> wrote:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.